24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2771  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jing_123456

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 一审Major revision,请问该怎么改? 已有1人参与

本人投稿一篇SCI,今天收到一审邮件,让我大修,有两个审稿人。一个审稿人给了7条意见,

Major:
1. But in Fig.3, Fig.4 and Fig.7, the 。。。 The 。。。。are no longer under unloading conditions, so the data provided are not relevant to the topic of this paper.
2.It is subjected to the diameter of a small hole in the suction valve and other parameters such as rotation speed. But in Fig.3, Fig.4 and Fig.7, there are no any indications about the specific value of the suction pressure.
3.Almost all the conclusions of this paper can be found in a textbook. The important issues with unloading conditions are not addressed such as 。。。。。, etc.

Minor:
1.In Table 2, the clearance at the outlet end should be 0.03mm, and at the inlet end should be 0.4mm.
2.In Fig.2, the flow meter 6 between oil separator 8 and compressor 3 can measure the two phase flow of oil and air?
3.In Fig.1, the air in the separator 3 is vented to atmosphere through valve7? How about the oil in the air?
4.In Highlights, "The shaft power is more at higher rotation speed and lower discharge pressure" should be at higher discharge pressure.
另一个没有给出具体意见
The paper repeated the model what has already been published, for example in 。。。。  and other papers of the same authors. Even modelling of the ******* was presented. The paper may be published after complete rewriting in which the authors will explain what is new in their paper and add more material to justify the paper publication.
    请问我该如何回复第二位审稿人的意见,还有改完之后论文有没有可能被录,
    请各位同学提供宝贵意见,谢谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vinnar

新虫 (小有名气)

楼主还是很幸运的~我好想收到过类似的审稿意见,但被编辑拒掉了~
13楼2016-02-24 16:25:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

rao0726

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jing_123456: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-02 15:16:11
jing_123456: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-02 19:11:54
好好修改,一条一条回答,希望很大

发自小木虫IOS客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

2楼2016-02-02 14:55:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2016-02-02 15:01:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jing_123456

铜虫 (初入文坛)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by rao0726 at 2016-02-02 14:55:46
好好修改,一条一条回答,希望很大

谢谢,我想请问下第二个审稿人的意见该怎么回答啊?
4楼2016-02-02 15:02:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生(3个名额)地质化工冶金领域 +5 AI8RaGaPaSCR 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-13 14:45 by ETH677aBoG2X
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +3 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 6/300 2026-08-13 14:38 by 超级海虾
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +8 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 26/1300 2026-08-13 12:01 by Tide man
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-13 10:40 by ZH远山
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键 +22 Lanmanbaby 2026-08-09 36/1800 2026-08-12 22:50 by sdfapple719
[基金申请] filecode +13 documentary 2026-08-10 15/750 2026-08-12 15:56 by 云上清扬
[论文投稿] 职称评审,求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊 +4 工厂打螺丝 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-12 09:18 by hansi2025
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +3 yuleib84 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 21:53 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +3 majunge000 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 20:13 by lch2012
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
信息提示
请填处理意见