| 查看: 449 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者donglonglong将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
donglonglong木虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
投稿修改意见求助 已有1人参与
|
|
|
Reviewer #1: The is a well presented work and I am of the view that with minor revisions, it will be an interesting readings for other in the area of electrical materials. However, I feel the tittle need to be reword to reflect the content of the work. 1. Introduction: Page 3, line 17 - 20, "...paper, we take the intuitive high voltage grade of arc ablation simulation experiment to represent the contact materials in opening and closing moment arc producing and extinguishing, and analyse contact materials ablation whether there is selective (for different components whether ablation at the same time or ablation a component of low melting point), and then put forward the ablation mechanism of the contact materials." 2. Experimental procedures Table 1 gives the properties of commercially available alloys, The impression is that these properties are quoted from a source or combination of sources, if that is the case, then appropriate references should be cited, otherwise, this section should include statements indicating by which standard methods were used to determine the quoted properties. A more (textual) detailed description of experimental set up, illustrated in Figure 1 is required. Without such description, it is hard to make sense of the exactness of the set up from the schematic illustration. This sentence is too long and it is hard to follow the meaning. In particular, the word "intuitive" seem to have no place here. The whole sentence should be reworded in an orderly manner. 想请问一下，审稿人第一条意见什么意思？不明天审稿人的意思。请大家相互交流，给点意见。谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
各位大神，目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件？
已经有14人回复
-
国社科系统bug了，是不是要放榜了？
已经有10人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有9人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有4人回复
-
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有3人回复
-
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组｜2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有11人回复
-
申博发邮件
已经有11人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
2楼2016-01-12 19:42:00