| 查看: 1233 | 回复: 4 | |||
[交流]
Material & Design Revise 帮忙分析分析 已有1人参与
|
|
一共三个审稿人的意见，编辑说如果3#审稿人还不满意就没戏了。。。一定要按照相应的意见改么？我这是欧拉梁的假设为什么一定要用铁木辛柯理论来验证呢。。。已经有实验了也不行么？现在这种情况有多大的机率录用呢？ Reviewers and editors commented on your above paper, and indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. If you feel that you can suitably address the comments below, I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days from today. Comments: Editorial: - criticisms by reviewer #3 should be particularly paid attention to. The manuscript will not be considered any further should there be still concerns from this reviewer. - please revise all highlights and graphical abstract to describe the findings (not the tasks). Please see further recommendations in the Editorial Note (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127515005031). Reviewer #1: The paper concerns with a very interesting and important problem. Taking into account presented results the proposed models offers a good consistency with results of FEM analysis and experiment. Results of only one experiment are presented. It would be worth to verify results also for other dimensions and types of piezoelectric materials as well as the mechanical subsystem (actuator and substrate). It would be necessary for validation of the proposed model. The font size of descriptions in the enclosed drawings should be bigger, which would improve their readability. Reviewer #3: The paper discuss the deformation of a three layer isotropic beam, however, author claims that the work is on bending deformation of active composite beams. 1. In the past two decades, various theories have been developed to predict the static and dynamic response of laminated composite beams, like, CLPT, FSDT and layerwise. 2. Most of the laminated theories particularly, layerwsie theory developed by J.M. Reddy has widely been used to determine the static and dynamic response of beams integrated with piezoelectric sensors and actuators. 3. 3. The present work assumes that the active layers are mounted at the outer surfaces, while there are a lot of works in which the active layers are located inside the laminates. 4. Therefore, using the present proposal to predict the deformation of laminated composite beams is not really new idea. 5. If the author insists to work on isotropic materials, it is recommended to use higher-order beam theories to improve the accuracy of the model like Timoshenko beam and 3D model. 6. Validating a close form solution with commercial software is not recommended. 7. The present work can be improved by at least providing a comparison with available theories like Timoshenko. Reviewer #4: The paper is original end contributes to scientific knowledge. The title and the summary are adequate to the contents presented in the article. The authors present A modified pin force model for beams with active material bonded. General and particular remarks: - Any sentences are too long. - Presented paper must be reviewed by translator. - It also needs checking according to: grammatical errors and sentences correction. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
云南大学材料与能源学院解琳课题组钙钛矿博士招生
已经有6人回复
-
反应很差，大量原料没有反应
已经有8人回复
-
面上本子正文33页，违规吗？会被低分嘛？
已经有13人回复
-
评审有感
已经有23人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有6人回复
-
Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验
已经有7人回复
-
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有20人回复
-
国自然评分
已经有4人回复
-
如果工作了想读博，可以边工作边读全日制嘛？
已经有5人回复
-
如何实现卤原子转化
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Material & design 编辑的意见是不是还有机会啊？
已经有11人回复
- "the rate sensitivity of the material" 指的是什么？
已经有5人回复
- ACS Applied Material & Interface 这杂志审稿多久有回复啊？
已经有4人回复
- 投material & design，with editor都差不多一个月了，早送早好，痛快点 不行么
已经有4人回复
- ACS applied material & interfaces 大修修回多长时间有消息啊
已经有21人回复
- 请问ACS Applied Material & Interface有模板吗
已经有1人回复
- 组织设计能投material & design？material & design侧重哪方面设计？
已经有4人回复
- ACS applied material & interfaces 的Mary Ann Meador 编辑如何
已经有7人回复
- 关于material &design投稿
已经有20人回复
- material & design
已经有4人回复
- Research Scientist in Insulation Material & System
已经有0人回复
- 求助material & design杂志审稿问题
已经有16人回复
15929731947
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 1109.7
- 散金: 1893
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 1565
- 在线: 371.5小时
- 虫号: 3135794
- 注册: 2014-04-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 声学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我认为审稿人觉得你用欧拉梁理论不够准确，因为欧拉梁相比于铁木辛克梁的假设更加理想化，他想让你用相对精度高一点的timoshenko梁来做.我师兄曾经做过层合梁的振动分析，用Timoshenko梁在中高频比欧拉梁要准确一些，而且，这也与你所选择的梁单元有关，是细长梁还是短粗梁，是吧，还是试试审稿人说的吧，不然他要是不满意，你文章希望就不大了，毕竟编辑那么说了！这只是我个人的理解，楼主参考着来 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2015-12-15 12:44:58
3楼2015-12-15 14:50:26
4楼2015-12-15 14:55:24
15929731947
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 1109.7
- 散金: 1893
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 1565
- 在线: 371.5小时
- 虫号: 3135794
- 注册: 2014-04-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 声学
5楼2015-12-15 14:56:04
5