| 查看: 7238 | 回复: 30 | |||
[交流]
JMPT审稿意见
|
|||
|
本人第一次投稿，没什么经验。投的JMPT终于结束under review状态了，历时两个月，回了一个审稿人意见和主编意见，给的大修建议，但很多地方很迷惑。 首先是审稿人给了我四十多条审稿意见，有四十条左右是关于语言的，比如把works改成work之类的。另外一些是关于推论分析的意见，最后审稿人给的是拒稿意见，搞不明白。下面是意见内容： The manuscript is of interest to the automotive industry. Unfortunately, it contains numerous language errors and a lot of misprints. Some sentences are even not understood by the referee and must be fully reformulated. The manuscript is therefore recommended to be rejected. In case the authors wish to make a substantial revision of their manuscript, I enclose more detailed comments below. 另外是主编的意见，也没看到很强的拒稿信息，不知道这是好事还是坏事。下面是意见内容： I will give you the chance of revising the manuscript, but the English MUST be improved substantially. A large number of sentences employ expressions and/or words which do not correspond to common usage in the field of materials processing, specifically welding. I strongly advise (MANDATORY) you to contact one of the many available LANGUAGE EDITING SERVICES, for instance at: https://www.elsevier.com/wps/fin ... s/languagepolishing Abstract: The abstract needs to be rewritten. Please rewrite the abstract as per the following standard definition: The abstract is expected to include a brief digest of the research, that is, new methods, results, concepts and conclusions. Please avoid including background information (background information is redundant to the specialist) or using the title of the paper as opening line (This refers to your current top 6 lines, that should be deleted). Also, connecting or transitional words and phrases such as "In this paper, The results indicate, however, besides, on the other hand, etc.", are redundant in the abstract (just delete them). Abstract/main text: Sentences should not begin with conjunctions such as "And" "Because…" or "But". The use of conjunctions as starting words is acceptable in colloquial English, but it is out of place in formal writing. 想听听各位前辈有什么意见和建议，顺便散点金币祈点福吧。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
2楼2015-12-12 18:26:31
7楼2015-12-12 19:03:51
9楼2015-12-12 19:22:01
10楼2015-12-12 19:23:24
22楼2015-12-12 21:38:58
23楼2015-12-12 21:42:41
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我觉得语言润色一下估计就问题不大了。另外请较一下楼主，这个期刊对参考文献的引用真的有那么严格吗，对每篇参考文献都要写出来别人的结果，然后评价工作，说明兑自己的研究的作用吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2015-12-12 21:47:01
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
26楼2015-12-12 23:48:10
27楼2015-12-15 21:24:30
28楼2015-12-15 21:25:52
29楼2015-12-15 21:26:51
30楼2015-12-15 21:27:05
31楼2015-12-15 21:42:00
简单回复
dmbb3楼
2015-12-12 18:28
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
time884楼
2015-12-12 18:29
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2015-12-12 18:48
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
skyish6楼
2015-12-12 19:00
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
优雅宁静8楼
2015-12-12 19:04
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
Song浅简莫11楼
2015-12-12 19:23
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
wdxmu12楼
2015-12-12 19:27
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yinhangka13楼
2015-12-12 19:29
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
70379450514楼
2015-12-12 19:31
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liucheng88315楼
2015-12-12 19:32
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
梁小新16楼
2015-12-12 19:34
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。。。。。 发自小木虫Android客户端
jiantu17楼
2015-12-12 19:34
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sunnyboy55518楼
2015-12-12 19:35
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
德耶谬19楼
2015-12-12 19:37
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
呃 发自小木虫Android客户端
shibiema20楼
2015-12-12 19:41
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
欢huan宜21楼
2015-12-12 19:42
回复
freeforyou(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
ssssllllnnnn25楼
2015-12-12 22:49
回复