| 查看: 742 | 回复: 0 | |||
a86262681银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
编辑回复，看不懂。求大神帮忙！！！！
|
|
投了个杂志，编辑回复：在review前需要再改下，有下面这些Comments ，特别是第三段有点不懂他的意思，有谁可以为我解答下吗？ A clear verifiable scientific reference to the traditional use is missing. E.g. mentioning that some traditional healers make such claims, or just saying that it is a well known traditional medicine is not sufficient. Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use. Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
