| 查看: 670 | 回复: 0 | ||
a86262681银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
编辑回复，看不懂。求大神帮忙！！！！
|
|
投了个杂志，编辑回复：在review前需要再改下，有下面这些Comments ，特别是第三段有点不懂他的意思，有谁可以为我解答下吗？ A clear verifiable scientific reference to the traditional use is missing. E.g. mentioning that some traditional healers make such claims, or just saying that it is a well known traditional medicine is not sufficient. Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use. Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有8人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有12人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有11人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有10人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有9人回复
-
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了
已经有7人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有9人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有10人回复