24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 286  |  回复: 0

a86262681

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助

投了个杂志,编辑回复:在review前需要再改下,有下面这些Comments ,特别是第三段有点不懂他的意思,有谁可以为我解答下吗?
A clear verifiable scientific reference to the traditional use is missing. E.g. mentioning that some traditional healers make such claims, or just saying that it is a well known traditional medicine is not sufficient.
Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use.
Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 a86262681 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见