| ²é¿´: 554 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
zyzing½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Eight reasons I rejected your article
|
|
A journal editor reveals the top reasons so many manuscripts don¡¯t make it to the peer review process. The Author Peter Thrower, PhDPeter Thrower, PhD. When a manuscript is submitted to a high-quality scholarly journal, it goes through intense scrutiny ¡ª even before it's seen by the editor-in-chief and selected for peer review. At Elsevier, between 30 percent to 50 percent of articles don't even make it to the peer review process. As Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, Dr. Peter Thrower experiences this situation first-hand. His advice to authors: "By avoiding these pitfalls, you will save reviewers, editors and staff time and frustration, and ensure that your work is judged by its scientific merit, not mistakes." |
» ±¾Ìû¸½¼þ×ÊÔ´Áбí
-
»¶Ó¼à¶½ºÍ·´À¡£ºÐ¡Ä¾³æ½öÌṩ½»Á÷ƽ̨£¬²»¶Ô¸ÃÄÚÈݸºÔð¡£
±¾ÄÚÈÝÓÉÓû§×ÔÖ÷·¢²¼£¬Èç¹ûÆäÄÚÈÝÉæ¼°µ½ÖªÊ¶²úȨÎÊÌ⣬ÆäÔðÈÎÔÚÓÚÓû§±¾ÈË£¬Èç¶Ô°æÈ¨ÓÐÒìÒ飬ÇëÁªÏµÓÊÏ䣺xiaomuchong@tal.com - ¸½¼þ 1 : Eight_reasons_I_rejected_your_article.pdf
2015-12-04 20:07:16, 26.16 K
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ085601
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
22408 µ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´

0.8
| ¶¥Ò»Ï£¬¸Ðл·ÖÏí£¡ |
2Â¥2015-12-05 09:48:49














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥