| ²é¿´: 552 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
zyzing½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Eight reasons I rejected your article
|
|
A journal editor reveals the top reasons so many manuscripts don¡¯t make it to the peer review process. The Author Peter Thrower, PhDPeter Thrower, PhD. When a manuscript is submitted to a high-quality scholarly journal, it goes through intense scrutiny ¡ª even before it's seen by the editor-in-chief and selected for peer review. At Elsevier, between 30 percent to 50 percent of articles don't even make it to the peer review process. As Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, Dr. Peter Thrower experiences this situation first-hand. His advice to authors: "By avoiding these pitfalls, you will save reviewers, editors and staff time and frustration, and ensure that your work is judged by its scientific merit, not mistakes." |
» ±¾Ìû¸½¼þ×ÊÔ´Áбí
-
»¶Ó¼à¶½ºÍ·´À¡£ºÐ¡Ä¾³æ½öÌṩ½»Á÷ƽ̨£¬²»¶Ô¸ÃÄÚÈݸºÔð¡£
±¾ÄÚÈÝÓÉÓû§×ÔÖ÷·¢²¼£¬Èç¹ûÆäÄÚÈÝÉæ¼°µ½ÖªÊ¶²úȨÎÊÌ⣬ÆäÔðÈÎÔÚÓÚÓû§±¾ÈË£¬Èç¶Ô°æÈ¨ÓÐÒìÒ飬ÇëÁªÏµÓÊÏ䣺xiaomuchong@tal.com - ¸½¼þ 1 : Eight_reasons_I_rejected_your_article.pdf
2015-12-04 20:07:16, 26.16 K
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
307·Ö²ÄÁÏרҵÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶283Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¼ÆËã»ú11408£¬286·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ£¬085600£¬344·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼ÁÉúѰÕÒµ¼Ê¦
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ0856 Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ 323 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§0703-Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211-338·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´

0.8
| ¶¥Ò»Ï£¬¸Ðл·ÖÏí£¡ |
2Â¥2015-12-05 09:48:49














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥