| 查看: 9617 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
投physical review letter 一审悲剧，大家看看有没有申诉的可能，现在好无助~已有4人参与
|
|||
各位虫友好，最近投了一篇prl，一审意见回来了，编辑给拒稿了（not under active consideration），审稿意见如下，不知道有没有申诉的希望，还是赶紧转投其他杂志？这个工作历时将近两年，好不甘心。。。金币不多请见谅 Dear Dr. XXX, The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees. A critique drawn from the reports appears below. On this basis, we judge that the paper is not appropriate for Physical Review Letters, but might be suitable for publication in another journal, possibly with some revision. Therefore, we recommend that you submit your manuscript elsewhere. Yours sincerely, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Report of Referee A ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In this paper the authors present a thorough study of XXX….. The presented study is careful and of high quality. It is also interesting and it could be very important if the formula that the authors propose is general enough to be used as a predictive tool to obtain XXX in general atomistic environments for any XXX of interest. My feeling is that the paper should definitely be published though I am not completely convinced that the journal in which it should be published is Physical Review Letters. However, if the authors address adequately the following points it could become possible to recommend its publication in PRL: 1)XXX 2)XXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Report of Referee B ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The manuscript by XXX presents a modeling study of XXX. A general formula is proposed to describe XXX. My main concern with the proposed model is its generality. The authors indicate that the model is general, but it has only been demonstrated for XXX. It is not clear whether this model applies to XXX. I think the applicability of this model to other XXX is unlikely, given that the XXX would be significantly more complicated than that of XXX. This limits the generality and overall impact of the proposed model. Overall, the proposed model is interesting and novel, but may be more appropriate for a specialized journal due to its limited applicability. The rich information in the supplementary information should also be included into the main text as a regular article, which is probably more appropriate for this study. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 投稿 |
» 猜你喜欢
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有5人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有29人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有5人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有12人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
读博
已经有4人回复
-
JMPT 期刊投稿流程
已经有4人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
投Physical Review Letters，今天发现文章的名字被改了一个单词
已经有2人回复- 投 the rournal of Physical Chemistry C 经验
已经有1人回复
- 投了会议abstract，还能否投PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS么
已经有4人回复
- 我投PHYSICAL REVIEW 杂志二审这个状态是不是肯定没希望了啊？
已经有1人回复
- 投Physics letters a 被拒的文章能否改投Physical review a
已经有1人回复
- 请问SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL上投一篇文章版面费多少
已经有7人回复
- 投Physical Review E编辑给的意见介于大修和拒稿之间，修改后录用的几率有多大
已经有56人回复
- 最近要投physical review A, 求WORD的模版！
已经有4人回复
- 投Physical review e都6天了还在with editor
已经有16人回复
- 前天投了Physical Reveiw A, 一直是with editors
已经有6人回复
- 那位投过The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 这个杂志？
已经有9人回复
- 谁投过European Physical Journal Plus？
已经有2人回复
- 投Physical Review Letters审稿人建议改投Physical Review
已经有37人回复
- Physical Review A 拒稿，改投求助！
已经有10人回复
- 投Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
已经有2人回复
- 投physical review e被拒
已经有3人回复
- 投physical review e 上传pdf文件行吗？
已经有0人回复
- 投physical review E时的图片处理
已经有3人回复
2楼2015-11-25 05:52:09
6楼2015-11-25 07:40:53
11楼2015-11-25 21:56:05
12楼2015-11-25 21:58:08
15楼2015-11-27 00:06:45