| 查看: 4413 | 回复: 8 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者fwforest将赠送您 95 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
fwforest金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
scientific reports审稿意见回复已有1人参与
|
|
|
小弟九月末投了一篇文章到scientific reports，最近收到审稿意见，但是有几个问题不知道是怎么回事儿，请各位大侠帮一下忙，给小弟点提示。谢谢。 问题1：从投稿状态来看找了好几个审稿人，但是为什么审稿意见中只有一个审稿人的？是其他人没有意见，还是说只有这一个人审了稿？ 问题2：修改时间一个月，能看出来是大修还是小修吗？ 问题3：这个审稿人的意见我不是很清楚到底想干啥，感觉貌似没有把整篇文章看完。遇到这种情况，回复的时候应该注意些什么？ 文章投稿状态和审稿意见如下： Stage Start Date 15th November 15 Decision Started 6th November 15 Manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s 6th November 15 Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s 23rd October 15 Manuscript Assigned to Editor 15th October 15 Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s 15th October 15 Manuscript Assigned to Editor 15th October 15 Manuscript Submitted 6th October 15 Quality Check Started 23rd September 15 Submission Not Complete 22nd September 15 Your manuscript entitled XXX has now been seen by the referee(s), whose comments are appended below. You will see that, while they find your work of interest, they have raised points that need to be addressed before we can make a decision on publication. We therefore invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript, taking into account the points raised. At the same time, we ask that you ensure your manuscript complies with our format requirements explained in full at https://www.nature.com/srep/authors/submit.html. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Technical Comments to the Author): Authors report molecular dynamics model to reproduce the experimental contact angle of a macroscopic mercury droplet on graphite. I believe authors carried out exhaustive simulation but i am afraid this work is appropriate to this journal. I would recommend a table with experimental contact angle on graphite with various simulation predicted values in the revised version. Given the hydrophobic nature of the graphite surface i would expect it would be easy to model however can the same simulation can be extended to other porous materials? If so i would recommend providing such information in the revised version |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有15人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
读博
已经有3人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
-
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有9人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
-
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
scientific reports审稿周期
已经有1人回复- 提出撤稿，编辑这么回复，是啥意思？
已经有17人回复
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- 投稿的艰难历程……求祝福
已经有153人回复
- scientific reports 一审修回，可是发现自己作死了……
已经有42人回复
- Micro Nano letter 审稿意见，是直接拒了还是按修改意见改好再投？
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮看看，这是不是修改重投呀...
已经有26人回复
- 一篇投稿Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A的漫长等待
已经有10人回复
9楼2015-11-24 21:10:41
15929731947
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 1109.7
- 散金: 1893
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 1565
- 在线: 371.5小时
- 虫号: 3135794
- 注册: 2014-04-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 声学
fwforest3楼2015-11-24 15:39:03
fwforest
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3619.4
- 散金: 780
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 270
- 在线: 399.4小时
- 虫号: 846321
- 注册: 2009-09-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文地质学(含地热地质学)
4楼2015-11-24 16:40:45
下里巴牛
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
珞喻山人
- 应助: 81 (初中生)
- 金币: 14056.6
- 散金: 2602
- 红花: 34
- 帖子: 2529
- 在线: 675.2小时
- 虫号: 882311
- 注册: 2009-10-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 人工智能与知识工程
5楼2015-11-24 16:44:29