| 查看: 306 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见要 the foregoing iissues are unclear and require some clarification
|
|
如题。一个二区稿子，ACS的。审稿意见如下： ****一大堆意见，其中几条，请教大家如何回复： ***and how this study contributes to the scope of this journal. The foregoing issues are unclear and require some clarification. The foregoing relates to the above suggestion as to the scope of this journal and its relative fit according to the study reported herein If the authors are able to address the general and specific concerns by the reviewer, the paper should undergo and 2nd round of review to determine its sutiability for publication in this journal or an alternative ACS journal (Langmuir) that may be better suited to this subject area. The reviewer recommends major revision prior to further consideration for publication. 一定要我列出之前发的类似文章？如果没有，难道我第一次发这种成果，不行？？？这个怎么处理比较好。请经验丰富的大牛们指点。谢谢 建议我另一个杂志，还有这种意见？这个期刊岂不是要气死了。我也懒得折腾了。就这个吧。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有11人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有12人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复