| 查看: 312 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见要 the foregoing iissues are unclear and require some clarification
|
|
如题。一个二区稿子，ACS的。审稿意见如下： ****一大堆意见，其中几条，请教大家如何回复： ***and how this study contributes to the scope of this journal. The foregoing issues are unclear and require some clarification. The foregoing relates to the above suggestion as to the scope of this journal and its relative fit according to the study reported herein If the authors are able to address the general and specific concerns by the reviewer, the paper should undergo and 2nd round of review to determine its sutiability for publication in this journal or an alternative ACS journal (Langmuir) that may be better suited to this subject area. The reviewer recommends major revision prior to further consideration for publication. 一定要我列出之前发的类似文章？如果没有，难道我第一次发这种成果，不行？？？这个怎么处理比较好。请经验丰富的大牛们指点。谢谢 建议我另一个杂志，还有这种意见？这个期刊岂不是要气死了。我也懒得折腾了。就这个吧。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料科学与工程320求调剂，080500
已经有9人回复
-
0703化学调剂 348分
已经有10人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
一志愿211，0703化学305分求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
材料工程调剂
已经有5人回复
-
287求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
362求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
273求调剂
已经有42人回复
