| 查看: 1838 | 回复: 37 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
帮忙分析一下审稿意见
|
|||
|
看不太懂，不知道是大修还是小修！尤其是第一个审稿人的第二条意见和第二个审稿人的第二条意见。先感谢大家了 Dear ** Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.?? For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. Your revision is due by?Nov 20, 2015. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper is interesting, organized and well written. 1. Notations in the paper have to be more general and consistent. Nomenclature table would have made this article more understandable to our readers. 2. The language is good, however, spelling, grammar and usage checks would make the paper more reachable. For example,the equation (11), (12) and (13) in page 4, it is noting that in page 8, et al.The authors are recommended to check the article thoroughly. 3. The authors should include some future work directions. Reviewer #2:? The text requires a major overhaul, and many paragraphs should be rewritten to improve both the syntax and the use of punctuation marks. The text is full of typos, strange signs appear, often no space is left after the comma or point. Many paragraphs are too long and do not use punctuation correctly, hindering the understanding of concepts. The scientific content could be improved considering control strategies based to stability index presented, differentiating work on others that only seek stability maps. At least you could outline as future work. 发自小木虫Android客户端 [ Last edited by sysu小虫虫 on 2015-10-22 at 16:36 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
27博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
厉娜
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有15人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有14人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有16人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有15人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见，是说我的工作和别人类似，还是要引用推荐的文献
已经有6人回复
- journal of power source审稿意见，大家帮忙分析一下
已经有11人回复
- 帮忙分析一下这条审稿意见，谢谢！
已经有1人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见！
已经有6人回复
- 能帮忙分析一下审稿人的画外音吗？ International journal of fatigue的。
已经有9人回复
- 论文大修，帮忙分析一下审稿人意见
已经有9人回复
- SCI大修，大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见，并散金100希望好运
已经有142人回复
- 各位帮忙分析一下这条审稿意见
已经有9人回复
- 各位帮忙分析一下审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮忙分析一下审稿状态
已经有1人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见是什么意思
已经有3人回复
- 收到审稿意见，大家帮忙分析一下
已经有12人回复
- 帮忙分析审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 请帮忙分析一下审稿人的意见
已经有3人回复
36楼2015-10-22 16:41:06
8楼2015-10-22 16:00:16
10楼2015-10-22 16:02:04
13楼2015-10-22 16:05:39
