| 查看: 1637 | 回复: 15 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者somerled将赠送您 12 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
求助：审稿意见中编辑的前三个意见到底是什么意思? 已有4人参与
|
||
|
Editors' report： Please take the point(s) with "X" below into consideration when revising your manuscript. 1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. x 2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. 3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication.It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words. 编辑的前三个意见，说了一下文章的三种类型。第三个问题是让我改成Short Communication. 可是又在第一句说要考虑“X” |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
26申博自荐
已经有5人回复
-
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有9人回复
-
带资进组求博导收留
已经有8人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
liuliang_045
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 147.1
- 散金: 2810
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 759
- 在线: 458.7小时
- 虫号: 413329
- 注册: 2007-06-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 样品前处理方法与技术
13楼2015-10-15 08:37:11
wangth0921
铁虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 117 (高中生)
- 金币: 1359
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 3740
- 在线: 787.1小时
- 虫号: 1426386
- 注册: 2011-10-03
- 专业: 环境污染化学
2楼2015-10-11 18:47:00
3楼2015-10-11 18:55:58
4楼2015-10-11 20:22:51