| 查看: 1644 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者somerled将赠送您 12 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
求助：审稿意见中编辑的前三个意见到底是什么意思? 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
Editors' report： Please take the point(s) with "X" below into consideration when revising your manuscript. 1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. x 2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. 3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication.It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words. 编辑的前三个意见，说了一下文章的三种类型。第三个问题是让我改成Short Communication. 可是又在第一句说要考虑“X” |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 投稿问题收集 |
» 猜你喜欢
带资进组求博导收留
已经有9人回复
-
求助大佬们，伤口沾上了乙腈
已经有6人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有6人回复
-
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有9人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 外文论文写作与投稿的一点经验，加两封催稿信
已经有47人回复
3楼2015-10-11 18:55:58
wangth0921
铁虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 117 (高中生)
- 金币: 1359
- 散金: 200
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 3740
- 在线: 787.1小时
- 虫号: 1426386
- 注册: 2011-10-03
- 专业: 环境污染化学
2楼2015-10-11 18:47:00
4楼2015-10-11 20:22:51
hilvp
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3454.4
- 散金: 1804
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 391
- 在线: 172.4小时
- 虫号: 826243
- 注册: 2009-08-11
- 专业: 能源化工
5楼2015-10-11 20:36:03