| 查看: 1632 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
第一篇LPL的论文，审稿人意见我看不懂要怎么修改，求帮忙分析一下 已有2人参与
|
||
|
1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
同一个分子，一条来自文献，一条来自AI——不告诉你答案，你会选哪条？
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
5楼2015-10-03 20:20:56
2楼2015-10-03 11:52:46
各位大神帮个忙吧！！！！！脑子现在都蒙圈了 ，编辑的回复如下：帮个忙吧The independent referees of your article entitled "Spreading of a tunable random electromagnetic beam in turbulent atmosphere" have already looked through your manuscript. Both of them have written to me that in their opinion your the article should be revised and reworked in order to be published. Please see their remarks below. Please upload your reworked article on your Personal Page in in the Submission System at our website as soon as possible. Please, upload together with the revised version your answers to the criticism and the description of made changes in the text. After that I will forward your updated article to your referees for further reviewing process. Sincerely, Alexander Yevseyev Laser Physics Letters Staff Editor ************************************************************************* 1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. [1] G. Wu, H. Zhou, and T. Zhao, “Propagation properties of electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model beams propagating through atmospheric turbulence,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 64(6), 826-831 (2014). |
3楼2015-10-03 13:37:49
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2485.9
- 散金: 5560
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 707
- 在线: 1023.3小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2006-07-08
- 专业: 植物资源学
4楼2015-10-03 14:09:28