| 查看: 1616 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
第一篇LPL的论文,审稿人意见我看不懂要怎么修改,求帮忙分析一下 已有2人参与
|
|
1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
两块石头
已经有8人回复
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
学科评审组评审是指会评吗?
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!!
已经有7人回复
2楼2015-10-03 11:52:46
各位大神帮个忙吧!!!!!脑子现在都蒙圈了![]() ![]() ![]() ,编辑的回复如下:帮个忙吧The independent referees of your article entitled "Spreading of a tunable random electromagnetic beam in turbulent atmosphere" have already looked through your manuscript. Both of them have written to me that in their opinion your the article should be revised and reworked in order to be published. Please see their remarks below. Please upload your reworked article on your Personal Page in in the Submission System at our website as soon as possible. Please, upload together with the revised version your answers to the criticism and the description of made changes in the text. After that I will forward your updated article to your referees for further reviewing process. Sincerely, Alexander Yevseyev Laser Physics Letters Staff Editor ************************************************************************* 1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. [1] G. Wu, H. Zhou, and T. Zhao, “Propagation properties of electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model beams propagating through atmospheric turbulence,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 64(6), 826-831 (2014). |
3楼2015-10-03 13:37:49
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2485.9
- 散金: 5560
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 707
- 在线: 1023.3小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2006-07-08
- 专业: 植物资源学
4楼2015-10-03 14:09:28
5楼2015-10-03 20:20:56
sunnyboy555
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 66 (初中生)
- 金币: 28856.1
- 散金: 316
- 红花: 23
- 帖子: 5666
- 在线: 88.7小时
- 虫号: 3635672
- 注册: 2015-01-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 流体力学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangjing140: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-04 08:01:31
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangjing140: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-04 08:01:31
|
你就按照他的意见也能找到对应的地方啊,这有什么纠结 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
6楼2015-10-03 20:30:19










回复此楼

