| 查看: 1436 | 回复: 5 | ||
[求助]
第一篇LPL的论文，审稿人意见我看不懂要怎么修改，求帮忙分析一下 已有2人参与
|
|
1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
2楼2015-10-03 11:52:46
各位大神帮个忙吧！！！！！脑子现在都蒙圈了 ，编辑的回复如下：帮个忙吧The independent referees of your article entitled "Spreading of a tunable random electromagnetic beam in turbulent atmosphere" have already looked through your manuscript. Both of them have written to me that in their opinion your the article should be revised and reworked in order to be published. Please see their remarks below. Please upload your reworked article on your Personal Page in in the Submission System at our website as soon as possible. Please, upload together with the revised version your answers to the criticism and the description of made changes in the text. After that I will forward your updated article to your referees for further reviewing process. Sincerely, Alexander Yevseyev Laser Physics Letters Staff Editor ************************************************************************* 1. Scientific soundness of the work and lack of serious scientific mistakes (1—9) 6 2. Scientific novelty and significance of the presented results (1—9) 4 3. Necessity of a quick publication (1—9) 4 4. General interest for wide readers (1—9) 5 5. Quality of the presentation (1-9) 5 6. Quality of the English (1-3 - not acceptable, 4-6 - needs minor revision, 7-9 – ok) 7 7. Recommendations: c) serious revision is required d) redirect to Laser Physics as not requiring urgent publication 1. The research topic on “electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model in atmospheric turbulence” has been reported in other published article, for example in the following reference [1], but the authors did not mention in the text, also did not cite. The authors should elaborate on their differences. [1] G. Wu, H. Zhou, and T. Zhao, “Propagation properties of electromagnetic multi-Gaussian Schell model beams propagating through atmospheric turbulence,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 64(6), 826-831 (2014). |
3楼2015-10-03 13:37:49
匿名
用户注销 (正式写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2485.9
- 散金: 5560
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 707
- 在线: 1023.3小时
- 虫号: 0
- 注册: 2006-07-08
- 专业: 植物资源学
4楼2015-10-03 14:09:28
5楼2015-10-03 20:20:56
sunnyboy555
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 66 (初中生)
- 金币: 27547.3
- 散金: 316
- 红花: 23
- 帖子: 5421
- 在线: 86.1小时
- 虫号: 3635672
- 注册: 2015-01-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 流体力学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wangjing140: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-04 08:01:31
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wangjing140: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-04 08:01:31
|
你就按照他的意见也能找到对应的地方啊，这有什么纠结 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
6楼2015-10-03 20:30:19