| 查看: 980 | 回复: 4 | |||
chenjunjiao新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
超级电容器方面怎么回复审稿人？付了审稿人意见 已有1人参与
|
|
大家看看我这个文章要怎么修改，已经第三次修改了？特别是阻抗部分把我搞糊涂了 以下是审稿意见： 1) Regarding the voltammetric profiles and the charge-discharge experiments it is not clear if effectively MnO2 contributes to the overall capacitance of the electrode. This should be addressed in the text. Moreover, the authors state that the electrode present a good rate capability but the scan rates tested were limited to 20mV/s, a rather low value. It would be interesting to see what would be the behavior of the material with higher scan rates. 2) The statement of page 9 line 16 is not clear. In fact, in the case of Warburg impedance the higher the slope the more difficult is the process - in the present case the slope is not vertical so I agree that ion diffusion/adsorption could occur swiftly. However the statement is unclear. 3) In Figure 5b, the authors present the values of capacitance, determined from the given equation, for different values of frequency. However, as stated previously, at low frequencies a Warburg behavior is observed and therefore the values of capacitance determined between 10-1and 10-2 are obviously meaningless, as in this frequency range the process that is occurring is diffusion. 4) The reasons presented by the authors to explain the differences in capacitances values obtained from EIS and GCD methods are also very controversial. In fact, the two techniques are different and different information is obtained from each one. First, the potential at which the impedance spectra were acquired is missing. In fact the reasoning presented would only make sense if the experiments were conducted at a potential where the redox process were active, otherwise only charging/discharging of the double layer would be observed. Moreover, this capacitive behaviour is not evident form the Nyquist plots alone, especially in the case of NiO. Bode plots should be provided to clear this point (see for example Electrochimica Acta Volume 167 (2015) 13-19). Also, the degree at which the samples are polarized in both methods is totally different making difficult comparison between them. This text concerning impedance analysis should therefore be completely revised. 5) Finally the authors should improve the English namely by avoiding the very long and confusing sentences. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Renlab@monash全奖博士机会，最后三天！
已经有0人回复
-
今年面上没有消息，想来是没了，散个金攒攒人品，为明年祈福
已经有698人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有269人回复
-
合肥工业大学854仪器技术综合专业课考研
已经有0人回复
-
27年电化学博士毕业，想找海外QS前50的高校读博后求推荐
已经有3人回复
-
27年电池/材料类博士申请
已经有2人回复
-
2027年博士申请或转博科研助理 求推荐
已经有1人回复
-
请问谁有2025最新影响因子Excel表？金币求助！
已经有53人回复
-
氯化钠与有机磺酸分离
已经有1人回复
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
已经有53人回复
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
  |
2楼2015-09-30 22:10:36
mzyr888
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 17 (小学生)
- 金币: 7296.8
- 散金: 2910
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 2602
- 在线: 1358.9小时
- 虫号: 516150
- 注册: 2008-03-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
3楼2015-10-02 21:16:00
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
 顶一下 |
4楼2015-10-04 17:08:16
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
 |
5楼2015-10-04 17:11:05
28