| 查看: 1009 | 回复: 4 | |||
chenjunjiao新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
超级电容器方面怎么回复审稿人？付了审稿人意见 已有1人参与
|
|
大家看看我这个文章要怎么修改，已经第三次修改了？特别是阻抗部分把我搞糊涂了 以下是审稿意见： 1) Regarding the voltammetric profiles and the charge-discharge experiments it is not clear if effectively MnO2 contributes to the overall capacitance of the electrode. This should be addressed in the text. Moreover, the authors state that the electrode present a good rate capability but the scan rates tested were limited to 20mV/s, a rather low value. It would be interesting to see what would be the behavior of the material with higher scan rates. 2) The statement of page 9 line 16 is not clear. In fact, in the case of Warburg impedance the higher the slope the more difficult is the process - in the present case the slope is not vertical so I agree that ion diffusion/adsorption could occur swiftly. However the statement is unclear. 3) In Figure 5b, the authors present the values of capacitance, determined from the given equation, for different values of frequency. However, as stated previously, at low frequencies a Warburg behavior is observed and therefore the values of capacitance determined between 10-1and 10-2 are obviously meaningless, as in this frequency range the process that is occurring is diffusion. 4) The reasons presented by the authors to explain the differences in capacitances values obtained from EIS and GCD methods are also very controversial. In fact, the two techniques are different and different information is obtained from each one. First, the potential at which the impedance spectra were acquired is missing. In fact the reasoning presented would only make sense if the experiments were conducted at a potential where the redox process were active, otherwise only charging/discharging of the double layer would be observed. Moreover, this capacitive behaviour is not evident form the Nyquist plots alone, especially in the case of NiO. Bode plots should be provided to clear this point (see for example Electrochimica Acta Volume 167 (2015) 13-19). Also, the degree at which the samples are polarized in both methods is totally different making difficult comparison between them. This text concerning impedance analysis should therefore be completely revised. 5) Finally the authors should improve the English namely by avoiding the very long and confusing sentences. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
固相反应中颗粒形貌变化计算模拟学习求助
已经有0人回复
-
电催化氧化技术处理高盐难降解废水具备独特优势
已经有0人回复
-
分析化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有296人回复
-
电化学水处理四种主流阳极材料性能与工况适配性对比探讨
已经有0人回复
-
深圳理工大学-深圳大学联合培养项目2027年接收推荐免试研究生
已经有2人回复
-
铁离子电池求助
已经有0人回复
-
想问为什么自制半电池循环只有50圈？
已经有0人回复
-
硕士研究生全国统考 英语二真题合集
已经有0人回复
-
2027年申博自荐信
已经有0人回复
-
电催化、芬顿、臭氧三大高级氧化工艺工程优缺点横向对比
已经有0人回复
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
  |
2楼2015-09-30 22:10:36
mzyr888
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 17 (小学生)
- 金币: 7297.8
- 散金: 2910
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 2602
- 在线: 1358.9小时
- 虫号: 516150
- 注册: 2008-03-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
3楼2015-10-02 21:16:00
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
 顶一下 |
4楼2015-10-04 17:08:16
chenjunjiao
新虫 (初入文坛)
 |
5楼2015-10-04 17:11:05
