24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

bobwatson

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 14.4
散金: 5
帖子: 115
在线: 9.7小时
虫号: 270375
注册: 2006-08-06
性别: GG
专业: 固体力学

[交流] 文章过长投PRL被拒，请问申述有用吗？

理论分析文章投PRL，没进行技术审稿直接被拒。拒绝信先是套话，最后说文章也超过长度了。其实缩短文章长度很容易，只要把部分内容放到补充材料里就行了。
不知有无必要申述，请各位赐教。

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

1楼 2015-09-30 13:18:53

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobwatson

铁虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 14.4
散金: 5
帖子: 115
在线: 9.7小时
虫号: 270375
注册: 2006-08-06
性别: GG
专业: 固体力学

拒绝信：
We have considered your manuscript and conclude that it is not suited
for Physical Review Letters.

We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your
work. However, from our understanding of the paper's physics results,
context, and motivation, we conclude that your paper does not meet the
Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest.
Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the
paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears
better suited for submittal to the latter.
[Please see our recent editorial
https://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 (2013).]

In view of our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript out for
review.

Yours sincerely,

Reinhardt B. Schuhmann
Editor
Physical Review Letters
Email: prl@aps.org
https://journals.aps.org/prl/

IMPORTANT: Editorial "Review Changes"
https://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001

P.S. In addition, the manuscript is much (~40%) too long for a Letter.
A materials science journal might be appropriate.