| 查看: 1234 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 mytitan 的 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
CHEM PHYS CHEM 有人投过吗？ 麻烦帮我分析一下审稿意见啊
|
|||
|
审稿意见回来了，但是对审稿人的想法拿捏不准，有说要添加数据的，可是文章已经很长了， 计算也要很久才完成，都相当于另一篇文章了，应该怎么处理好呢？ 恳请过来人给点意见，按编辑的意思这个算小修还是大修？ —————————————————————————————————————————————— 编辑意见如下： Dear ***, Thank you for your submission of 14 Aug 2015. Your manuscript might be suitable for publication in ChemPhysChem. However, the criticism from the referees forces us to defer a final decision until you have considered their remarks and revised your manuscript accordingly. Please include a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments in the "Respond to Reviewers" box, including a list of changes made and a rebuttal to any comments with which you disagree. To facilitate the handling of your manuscript, please also upload a file with a point-to-point response to the previous reviewer comments, including a list of changes and a rebuttal to any comments with which you disagree. In addition, please highlight the changes made during revision - this will be a tremendous help to us and to the referees. In carrying out the revisions please try to ensure that the overall length of the paper does not increase significantly. If you think you might need more than about two weeks for the revisions, please let us know. We can then withdraw your manuscript so that you can work without the pressure of a deadline. You can then submit your revised manuscript later as a new manuscript with a reference to the earlier version and an explanation of the changes/additions etc. Please be assured that it will be treated exactly as we would a normal revised manuscript. After we receive your revised manuscript and response to the remarks from our referees, we will endeavor to make a decision on the acceptance or rejection of your article as soon as possible, though further refereeing may be required. We generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time. Therefore, please make full use of the first revision! To submit your revision, go to https://cphc.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author using your username and password. Your submission can be found under the menu item "Submissions Needing Revision". Due to technical reasons, it might take a few minutes after receipt of this message. If you have forgotten your password, please use the "Send Access Credentials" option given on the login screen. If, however, you would prefer a rapid publication of the manuscript in its present form, we realize that you may wish to offer it to another journal. In that case please inform us with a short note. Yours sincerely, |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
带资进组求博导收留
已经有10人回复
-
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有11人回复
-
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？
已经有4人回复
-
需要合成515-64-0，50g，能接单的留言
已经有3人回复
-
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）
已经有3人回复
-
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有8人回复
-
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Chem Phys letter
已经有7人回复
- 寻找 Chem Phys Chem 杂志
已经有4人回复
- chem phys lett 和chem phys是物理杂志还是化学杂志
已经有4人回复
送红花一朵 8楼2015-09-20 21:23:26
|
第二个部分 REVIEWER REPORT EVALUATION: Reviewer's Responses to Questions 1. Please rate the importance of the reported results Reviewer #1: Important (next 35%) Reviewer #2: Important (next 35%) -------------------- 2. Please rate the citation of previous publications Reviewer #1: Appropriate Reviewer #2: Appropriate -------------------- 3. Please rate the length of the manuscript Reviewer #1: Concise Reviewer #2: Concise -------------------- 4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data Reviewer #1: Fully consistent Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies -------------------- 5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: *---- |
2楼2015-09-19 10:10:19
3楼2015-09-19 14:26:51
独步青云
新虫 (职业作家)
术中小生
- 应助: 894 (博后)
- 金币: 2993.1
- 散金: 3834
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 3587
- 在线: 241.8小时
- 虫号: 339818
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 中药质量评价
4楼2015-09-19 16:18:37