24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2416  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者baiquan1119将赠送您 5 个金币

baiquan1119

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 回复审稿人

Dear Professor Quan:
The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript within four weeks.
To revise your manuscript, log into https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aime and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision.

You may also click the below link to start the revision process (or continue the process if you have already started your revision) for your manuscript. If you use the below link you will not be required to login to ScholarOne Manuscripts.

https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aime?URL_MASK=68231929b0e14d46a406a9afaad83bb5


You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of the manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Please also highlight the changes to your manuscript within the document by using bold or coloured text.

Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Centre.

When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you make to the original manuscript. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s).

Authors should use only citations that are relevant to their manuscripts and which directly and significantly contribute to the scholarly content of the paper. Addition of citations, including those suggested by reviewers, which are not relevant to the work is strongly discouraged. Any citation(s) added to your manuscript at the revision stage should be accompanied by an explanation of why these are the most relevant to the submitted manuscript. Authors should not include citations to their own (or their associates’) work merely to increase their (or their associates’) citation count or to enhance the visibility of their or their associates’ work.

IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Advances in Mechanical Engineering, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Before submitting your revised manuscript, we would also be grateful if you could please ensure that you have obtained all necessary permissions for any material in your paper that has been previously published. Please e-mail copies of such permissions to the journal office when submitting the revised manuscript.

Please note, for legal reasons we would be unable to publish your paper in the journal should permissions not have been granted directly by the copyright holder for any previously published content, including figures and tables. Failure to provide all permissions at this stage may delay publication of your manuscript.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Advances in Mechanical Engineering and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Sincerely,
Professor Magd Abdel Wahab
Editorial Board Member, Advances in Mechanical Engineering
magd.abdelwahab@ugent.be


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
In this paper, a type of circular piezoelectric vibrator is analyzed. Via FEM, the effects of some key structural parameters on the maximum voltage are analyzed. Then the optimized parameters are used to provide high voltage for ER fluid in an experimental study.
Although some contributions are found in this manuscript, there are several problems as follows.
(1) Although the authors think “they proposed methods to optimize the parameters to maximize the harvested voltage”, in fact, there is no such an optimization method in this manuscript. In Section 3.1, the authors should provide detail description about their optimization method.
(2) Although some useful conclusions have been drawn, few original contents are found. The authors should explain what novel work is there in their study.
If the authors can provide answers to above problems, I will consider this manuscript again.


Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
The work and results are very interesting, but poorly explained and justified.
It would be interesting to include a comparison study and finite element d31 and d33 modes.
It is not entirely justified why the d33 mode is chosen.
The images have very poor quality.
The experimental design, varying length and diameter on one side on the other, does not consider that may have crossed factors further optimize the geometric solution. I would recommend make some kind of multivariate statistical analysis.
These results can be represented more graphically that a table (for example a surface) shape.
The work would be more complete if it would included some kind of theoretical development (as paper referenced [1]) and if it would be compared with finite element models and real ensayo.
I miss a diagram of boxes that best explains the test rig.
请大家帮我看看,这些评论好修改吗?是小修还是大修啊?请问回答问题格式怎么写好呢
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

baiquan1119

新虫 (初入文坛)

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The authors have impoved their manuscript. I think this paper can be considered for publication.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
(There are no comments.),这是什么情况啊
2楼2015-10-14 18:59:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dongdadahao

木虫 (正式写手)

论文发表了吗
3楼2015-11-15 12:45:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

baiquan1119

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by dongdadahao at 2015-11-15 12:45:48
论文发表了吗

还没有,Thank you for your email. Although extra referees have been added, we only require responses from the first two. As soon as we receive both of these reports we will be able to respond. I hope this answers your question.这是他们的回复,都一个多月了还是没有消息
4楼2015-11-18 09:46:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tangtx220

新虫 (初入文坛)

修改后多长时间回复你的?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2016-08-13 07:58:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

程小星

新虫 (正式写手)

6楼2016-12-08 23:44:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 baiquan1119 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见