| 查看: 707 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
这句话如何简练的表达
|
|||
|
The result shows that the average and the maximum RMS wavefront error in the whole field of view of 0.3°×0.15° are 0.063 and 0.068 respectively after the 4th alignment action with 3rd order model, and the average and the maximum RMS wavefront error in the whole field of view of 0.3°×0.15° are 0.025 and 0.011 respectively after the 3rd alignment action with 5th order model. 请问上面这句话怎么说简练一点? 只有一次修改机会,本来不想冒险改的,不过看着实在太罗嗦 |
» 猜你喜欢
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
考博
已经有4人回复
药化及相关博士的申请
已经有3人回复
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有4人回复
一个化合物的合成路线:CAS:367929-02-0 名称:8β-乙烯基雌二醇
已经有4人回复
中国地质大学(北京)博士招生补录,数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业
已经有3人回复
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评
已经有3人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
|
The result shows that the average and the maximum RMS wavefront errors in the whole field of view of 0.3°×0.15° are 0.063 and 0.068 respectively after the 4th alignment action with 3rd order model, and 0.025 and 0.011 respectively after the 3rd alignment action with 5th order model. 另动词时态可考虑是现在时还是过去时更妥。 |
4楼2015-08-29 18:49:46
【答案】应助回帖
| The result shows that the average and the maximum RMS wavefront error is 0.063 and 0.068 respectively after the 4th alignment action with 3rd order model, and after the 3rd alignment action with 5th order model, the error is 0.025 and 0.011 respectively, in the whole field of view of 0.3°×0.15°. |

2楼2015-08-29 14:46:09
3楼2015-08-29 14:58:44












回复此楼