24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者曼鱼0429将赠送您 20 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

曼鱼0429

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1655.1
散金: 263
帖子: 398
在线: 47.2小时
虫号: 3435964
注册: 2014-09-23
性别: MM
专业: 农学基础与作物学

[求助] 电分析化学投稿，如何回复审稿意见——为什么用铁氰化钾做探针——跪求回复已有1人参与

投稿JSSE，审稿人回复的意见没看太懂，跪求解释，我是科研上的失败者，请大家赐教

IV) The electrochemical characterization of the nanocomposite uses routine CV (Figure 1) and EIS experiments (Figure 2) with Fe(CN)63-/Fe(CN)64- as a redox probe. In this regard:

a) The use of a redox probe different from the analyte, although widely used in the literature, has a limited validity. See Seeber et al. Functional Materials in Amperometric Sensing, Springer, 2014.（这本书要两千多美元，太贵，买不起……）

b) The authors provide a series of values attributed to the charge transfer resistance in the text in page 7. These values are provided with an unrealistic number of significant figures if replicate experiments are used and have only a definite meaning if the experimental EIS data are fitted to a concrete equivalent circuit.（完全没看懂是啥意思

）

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

……

1楼 2015-08-26 16:10:54

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

xj787133830

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1344.5
帖子: 4
在线: 8.2小时
虫号: 2647307
注册: 2013-09-11
专业: 电化学分析

我最近也遇到了这个问题，想请教下lz当时是怎么回答“a) The use of a redox probe different from the analyte, although widely used in the literature, has a limited validity. See Seeber et al. Functional Materials in Amperometric Sensing, Springer, 2014.”这个问题的啊？好捉急~~~