24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

entomology

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

御赐千年虫加封黄马褂

应助: 195 (高中生)
金币: 34827.4
散金: 1216
红花: 19
帖子: 7040
在线: 1026.5小时
虫号: 330352
注册: 2007-03-24
性别: GG
专业: 昆虫学

[交流] 转载：科学网—罗马尼亚国家科研基金评阅过程已有1人参与

科学网—罗马尼亚国家科研基金评阅过程 - 王毅翔的博文
https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2649160-910749.html

本人几次参与罗马尼亚各种国家科研基金评阅

- 认为其过程较好，也方便实行

Romanian national research grant review

1 .英文标书。

Proposal are written in English

2. 请国际评阅人 - cost 预算部分海外评阅人不用打分，但可以提建议-。

The majority of reviewers are from oversea (to my knowledge, but this may differ from time to time). The oversea reviewers are not requested to score the budget, but can make suggestions on the budgeting.

3. 网上审阅完成。

All procedures are done online, quite interactive.

4. 初评后各评阅人可以看到另外评阅人的打分及评语。

After the 1st round of evaluation, each reviewer can look at the comment and score of each section of the proposal by other reviewers for the same proposal. If there is major difference in scores, revision is suggested, though a reviewer can have the option to stick to initial score.

5. 打分明显不同者建议重新考虑 -但评阅人可以坚持己见 - 中间有一个协调人。

5. 评阅结果给申请人，申请人提出辩护。

5. The comments and scores are feedback to the applicants. The applicants can put forward rebuttals / explanations.

6，根据申请人辩护，考虑调整打分。

6. Based onthe applicants’ rebuttal / explanation, scores are further adjusted.

7.总结评分。

7. Final score.

网上进行，也比较快捷。

因为有几次提醒评阅人修改分数；可以避免评阅草率的错误。

本人认为过程很好。

The on-line system is interactive and speedy, in the meantime the system is manned and e-mail reminders are sent out timely.

Because a few reminders for score revision are given, also one reviewer can see other reviewers’ comments; errors due to reviewers are minimized

Personally, I think it is a good system.

评阅每份标书有小小的报酬– 也许这样会使评阅人增加用心。

作为panelist 还在2012 年去过一次其首都Bucharest。会议由一位外地 (非首都)来的副教授主持，言行低调。与她聊过罗马尼亚加入欧盟及科技人员外流的事。

---

- (附：今年初去格鲁吉亚第比利斯参加过NIH 的 workshop；看当地英文报纸，常常拿欧盟的标准与格鲁吉亚的数据比较。有明确的目标和参照对象，相信前苏联加盟共和国格鲁吉亚也较快会达到欧盟水平)

本文引用地址：https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2649160-910749.html 此文来自科学网王毅翔博客，转载请注明出处。

回复此楼