24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6190  |  回复: 48
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

claire乐莜

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] SCI文章悲剧了。。 已有7人参与

三个审稿人,一个小修,一个大修,还有一个拒稿。其中拒稿的原因如下:
The manuscript deals with an interesting research topic. However, there are important reasons for recommending the rejection of the manuscript.

The introduction section is excessively long. It does not justify the novelty and the contribution to the field of the research performed. The objectives are not stated clearly.

The experimental design is not appropriated. The experiments were not repeated. Therefore, the results showed in the manuscript are not statistically significant.
最后一点这个拒稿意见是什么意思?实验重复了吗?编辑意见还挺有好的,说可以修改后重投,想搞清楚这个审稿人拒稿的原因。。请大神帮忙看一下吧
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

whm1

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
claire乐莜: 金币+1, 有帮助 2015-07-13 16:55:58
拒稿的原因可能是文章结构有点乱,重新调整哈结构看看。
11楼2015-07-13 15:35:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 claire乐莜 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见