24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

linlufen424

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3
帖子: 2
在线: 3.7小时
虫号: 3193105
注册: 2014-05-09

[交流] 大修被编辑秒拒，已经按照审稿人的意见认真修改了，是否应该申诉？已有17人参与

LZ之前投STARCH，一个月以后回来的意见是大修，三个审稿人的意见都不多，一个是认为要further discuss, 一个说interesting,没提意见，还有一个说要minor revision.
Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
Why not use the Statistica program for analysis of resulados?

Figure 1 only shows the results before the microwave treatment. Where are the results after the microwave treatment?

The results were not enough compared to the results in the literature. It is necessary to further discussion.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
This article addresses factors commenting relationship between radical generation and microwave irradiation for various types of rice flour. The subject is not a new but analysis is interesting and within the scope of the Starch Journal.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
Dear Editor,
The manuscript has been reviewed precisely. The hidden hazards of Microwave are since several years in the centre of interest. Therefore efforts to proving the truth are welcome.
The study has been designed thoughtful and contains some useful data, thus this article is deserved to be published in STARCH after minor corrections.
The followings must be taken into consideration:
- Radical generation mechanism as well as radical generation and losses kinetics must be included in text.

LZ按照审稿人的意见补了实验，补充了discussion,还用SPSS处理了数据，害怕时间拖太长，三周后就提交了修改稿和response letter.然而提交以后两天内就收到了编辑的拒信，理由只有一句话，而且完全没有审稿人的意见。
Dear Author(s),

I regret to inform you that your manuscript star.201500106.R1 has not been accepted for publication in Starch.
The English and content of this paper has not been improved sufficiently for publication and therefore is rejected. Please note that this decision is final.

Where review/further review was sought for the decision, the reviewers' comments are included at the end of this letter. Hopefully this will not deter you from making new submissions in the future.

Yours faithfully,

Prof. Richard Tester
Editor

Referee(s)' Comments to Author:

看到拒信顿时心凉了半截，辛辛苦苦修改的文章就这么莫名其妙被拒了。实在是想不明白。导师也很气愤，建议我给编辑发邮件询问原因，说明自己已经认真修改的情况。求助大家，请问发这封邮件有必要吗？如有必要，需要怎么说呢？
现在真的很绝望，希望能得到大家的意见，谢谢大家~

回复此楼