| 查看: 4101 | 回复: 18 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
互挂通讯大家怎么看 已有17人参与
|
|||
|
会不会有不好的影响？ [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生物学学硕求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
上海电力大学材料防护与新材料重点实验室招收调剂研究生（材料、化学、电化学，环境）
已经有4人回复
-
材料学求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿武理085500机械专业总分300求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
考研调剂
已经有4人回复
-
281求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0805 316求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
085601求调剂总分293英一数二
已经有3人回复
-
08工学调剂
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 老板介绍一老外，合作写论文，非要挂通讯作者，有影响吗？
已经有16人回复
- 请问H因子是只统计第一作者和通讯作者论文？还是只要有挂名的都可以统计？
已经有5人回复
- 国内分析化学专业核心期刊哪些可以挂双通讯作者
已经有5人回复
- 做同一个方向的两个人，同时申请基金，互相挂名是否会有影响？
已经有7人回复
- OE能挂双通讯吗？能的话应该怎么写？
已经有13人回复
6楼2015-05-31 15:55:26
198782
金虫 (正式写手)
电镀制药生物
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1528.8
- 散金: 30
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 523
- 在线: 117小时
- 虫号: 3250488
- 注册: 2014-06-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机金属化学
2楼2015-05-31 14:30:13
WolfYang
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 138 (高中生)
- 金币: 16895.4
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 3080
- 在线: 927.5小时
- 虫号: 2496982
- 注册: 2013-06-05
- 专业: 力学中的基本问题和方法
3楼2015-05-31 14:55:38
★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
sculhf: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2015-05-31 16:29:09
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
sculhf: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2015-05-31 16:29:09
|
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Kulkarni AV, Devereaux PJ, Leece P, Bajammal S, Heels-Ansdell D, Busse JW (2014) Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67: 1049-1054 Abstract Objectives We explored how readers interpret authors' roles based on authorship order and corresponding author. Study Design and Setting We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all 291 Surgical and Medical Chairpersons across North America. We developed hypothetical study and authorship bylines with five authors varying the corresponding author as first or last author. Respondents reported their perceptions about the authors' roles in the study and the most prestigious authorship position. We used multinomial regression to explore the results. Results One hundred sixty-five chairpersons (response rate: 57%) completed our survey. When the first author was designated as corresponding author, most of the respondents assumed that this author had taken the lead in study design (55.3%) and analysis and interpretation of data (51.2%). When the last author (fifth) was designated as corresponding, perceptions of the first author's role in study concept and design (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.41) and analysis and interpretation of results (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.38) decreased significantly. Overall prestige of the last author position increased significantly when designated as corresponding author (OR = 4.0, 95% CI: 2.4, 6.4). Conclusions Academic department chairs' perception of authors' contributions was influenced by corresponding author designation. Without authors' explicit contributions in research articles, many readers may draw false conclusions about author credit and accountability. |
4楼2015-05-31 15:02:48
