| 查看: 4424 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
JACS审稿意见求助 已有2人参与
|
||
|
做了一个MOF，做了一些催化做性质，其实就是为了找点应用。投稿到JACS，选的Yaghi。倒霉的是选了三个审稿人，两个搞有机的，一个是搞MOF的。做MOF的提了一些问题，让补做点实验，改成全文。悲催的是两个有机的审稿人觉得催化做的太差，提了好多问题，一个改成全文，一个给据。 其实我们做催化就是找点应用，没想到送到有机人手里，现在一个有机的审稿人提了非常多的意见，我是做MOF的，对有机催化套路不熟，现在头大，还有就是有些意见是在不知道怎么办，例如催化后我们做了XRD说明MOF结构没变，但是有个审稿人居然让去做个核磁？是在是不知道怎么办，固体核磁也不能说明问题啊。能不能解释下，还是审稿人的意见必须完全照做？ Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose comments are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept this manuscript for publication in the Journal of the American Chemical Society in its current form. However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the reviewers' concerns in full, I am willing to consider a resubmission of this manuscript as a FULL ARTICLE, if it can be submitted by 09-Nov-2015, at the latest. Your manuscript is likely to go back to the present reviewers and to one or more additional new reviewers for further input and advice before any final decision on possible publication is made. To help me expedite processing, explicitly address the questions raised by the Editor and reviewers and clearly point out the changes made in the manuscript. Provide this information in the "Response to Decision Letter" text box when you submit the revised manuscript. Alternatively, you may attach a file containing your detailed responses, including explanations for disagreeing with any of the suggestions that you have chosen not to follow. Please annotate a copy of the manuscript to show revisions and track changes for the benefit of the reviewers. This marked manuscript should be uploaded electronically in the File Upload section as "Supporting Information for Review Only". If you decide not to revise and resubmit for further JACS consideration, please notify me by email (yaghi-office@jacs.acs.org) at your earliest convenience. Include the following information in the subject line of your email message: Du ja-2015-04050g Sincerely, Prof. Omar M. Yaghi Associate Editor Journal of the American Chemical Society University of California, Berkeley Phone: 202-754-1230 Fax: 202-354-5460 Email: yaghi-office@jacs.acs.org ------------------------------------ Reviewer Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Expand to article.. Additional Questions: Significance: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Novelty: High (suitable for JACS) Broad interest: High (suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Expand to article. Comments: Additional Questions: Significance: High (suitable for JACS) Novelty: Highest (top 5%, suitable for JACS) Broad interest: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: In Part Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Publish elsewhere. Comments: Additional Questions: Significance: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Novelty: Lowest (not suitable for JACS) Broad interest: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Scholarly presentation: Moderate (not suitable for JACS) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION PLEASE CONTACT: ACS Publications Customer Services & Information (CSI) Email: support@services.acs.org Phone: 202-872-4357 Toll Free Phone: 800-227-9919 (USA/Canada only) |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中南大学易小艺课题组诚招2026申请-考核制博士生
已经有0人回复
-
海南师范大学招收化学博士（光电功能材料课题组招收博士研究生）
已经有10人回复
-
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有157人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- JACS小修后要等多久？
已经有27人回复
- 请问nanotechnology一般投稿到收到审稿意见一般要等多久？
已经有3人回复
- 投JACS的一篇文章被拒，刚刚看到一篇一样的文章出现在JACS上
已经有131人回复
- 与大家分享JACS从投稿到接收这一个月的经历
已经有34人回复
- JACS被拒改投OL，题目稍改了下，OL主编和审稿人会看到JACS审稿意见吗？
已经有16人回复
- JACS修改后多久可以返回
已经有27人回复
- jacs投稿-大家分析下有申诉必要吗
已经有18人回复
- JACS的投稿状态
已经有14人回复
- jacs,3个审稿人，2个大修，一个小修。被接受的希望大不大？
已经有18人回复
- OL接收，CC审稿，JACS数据基本已完成。
已经有71人回复
- JACS投稿文件的困惑
已经有6人回复
- JACS communication 审稿周期多长呀？快一个月了，还没消息
已经有11人回复
- JACS悲剧，转投Chem Sci五天了，送审没？
已经有7人回复
- Jacs大修后编辑的来信，这是个什么情况？
已经有26人回复
- JACS投稿后多久返回审稿意见
已经有38人回复
- 补充下审稿意见，大家看看JACS申诉胜算多大？？
已经有15人回复
- 收到JACS审稿意见， 据稿要申诉么？？？
已经有58人回复
- JACS审稿问题....
已经有21人回复
- JACS投稿求助。
已经有51人回复
- jacs有一个审稿人不同意发表，还有没有希望？
已经有23人回复
- JPCC审稿意见让人痛不欲生
已经有19人回复
4楼2015-05-27 23:15:32
xwnail2003
禁虫 (著名写手)
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2015-05-26 20:33:56
3楼2015-05-26 22:49:18
5楼2015-05-27 23:16:15