24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1305  |  回复: 5

munan0302

银虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] Carbohydrate Polymers 审稿意见求助已有4人参与

审稿意见求解读~~个人感觉是小修,可是现在稿件状态是reject,下面的是拒收后的审稿意见,我是改好了之后再重新投稿吗?还是直接改投别的期刊呀?求助~~~~PS:此期刊已拒搞2次:1次是文章题目格式不合格,1次是推荐审稿人要求是不同国家的人,一个月后又被拒搞,显示的就是以下意见,求高人指点呀~~~~我现在该怎么办

Reviewer #2: Comments to the Author:
Manuscript: CARBPOL-S-15-01364 "Preparation and characterization of Chitosan-graft-Poly(L-lactic acid) Microparticles ".
1. The focus of this paper is that EDC/NHS was used as a coupling agent to prepare Chitosan-graft-Poly(L-lactic acid) copolymers with significantly improved performance, but its title did not exactly coincide with its main contents. Such a title as "Preparation of Chitosan-graft-Poly(L-lactic acid) Copolymers with Significantly Improved Performance by a Novel Method", may be more suitable.
2. In Page 3, Line 22, "using EDC" should be "using EDC/NHS".
3. In Page 4, Line 19, why pH=5.0 was selected.
4. In Page8, Line 12, in the title of Fig.3, Capital A, B, C should be replaced by a, b, c.
5. In Page 9, Line 13, Equation 1is not marked in the text (see Page 5, Line 15).
6. Please illustrate in detail the process to calculate the substitution degree in Table 1 by elemental analysis results.
7. The English writing of the manuscript should be carefully revised by a native English speaker.
USE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STANDARD
The Journal cannot process any further a paper which is not written with a good standard of use of English language including spelling.  Unfortunately your paper as indicated in the report above fails the standard, and therefore must be rejected. This is often a pity since the substance of the paper is often well worth publishing. On the other hand, some papers have been presented with poor science as well as poor use of English.
Authors must avail themselves of the services of an English language usage expert to correct their paper. Authors must then, in any further submission of the paper (which will be as a new paper), include their responses to all the reviewer comments together with a confirmation that this language improvement has been done with expert help.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

munan0302

银虫 (初入文坛)

怎么都每人回复我呀。。。。自己给自己顶一下!
2楼2015-05-12 21:25:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

Translator and Proofreader


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
munan0302: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2015-05-13 08:36:05
munan0302: 金币+10 2015-05-13 08:49:46
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by munan0302 at 2015-05-12 08:25:45
怎么都每人回复我呀。。。。自己给自己顶一下!

内容上没什么问题,致命伤是语言上的问题。语言上解决了就可以接受了。需要首先根据审稿人意见修改内容,定稿后解决语言问题。最后重投便可。
3楼2015-05-12 21:59:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

QQHYD

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

牛人SCI论文高手5年发表了1000多篇SCI论文,推荐一下              http://ghyikuytfg.blog.163.com/blog/static/248695086201541872031265/?newFollowBlog
4楼2015-05-21 10:52:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

old_yang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

修改好以后,重新投,英语的问题,要重视,可以请专业的帮你润色。
5楼2015-05-21 11:20:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shenai137

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

主要是英文的问题,感觉有点抱怨你不够认真,格式不符啊,拼写错误啊,这个其实是大忌,说明你对人家期刊要求没有认真研究,态度方面不够。
按审稿人的意见好好修改,最重要的是要找专业人士修改英文 with a confirmation that this language improvement has been done with expert help.
6楼2015-05-21 12:51:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 munan0302 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见