24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2208  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

笨小孩1

金虫 (小有名气)


[求助] Biomaterials投稿返回小修,还是不淡定已有3人参与

博士第一篇论文,生物制造方向,没报希望的投了Biomaterial,审稿三个月后,4.29号收到一审结果,两个审稿人,均建议小修,很意外,当然很开心。可是问题来了:
总共6个意见,格式、图片、数字这些很好修改,纠结的是有个建议是让我考虑下生理条件,问我生物大分子是否也可以适用?,也没有明说让补实验,重点是我也没条件补实验。怎么办?有点不淡定了,老板建议直接引用几篇证明生物大分子可以穿透这种材料的文献即可。  求教各位虫友,这种情况,应该怎么回复啊?下面附上修改意见(这两个意见应该是一个意思):

Reviewer #2:
1.Throughout the manuscript the authors kept mentioning that built-in microchannels formed by hollow filaments were promising for nutrients delivery. However, only a perfusion test by pumping dye solution was performed. Maybe more considerations about physiological conditions and the way of nutrients delivery are needed to give solid supports.
Reviewer #4:
1. The authors highlighted that the printed hydrogel structures with built-in microchannels show better fusion behaviors for nutrients and growth factors, however, only red or purse dyes were used to test the fusion ability which actually are small molecules. Can biomacromolecules, for example proteins, at least GFP or RFP fuse freely in the printed hydrogel structures?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

smilemoon

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
既然实验比较难做,就按照你老板的建议,直接引用几篇文献来理论论证即可。
3楼2015-05-02 17:20:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 笨小孩1 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见