| 查看: 993 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
三个评审两个同意，会不会悲剧？已有2人参与
|
|||
|
投的ChemPhysChem杂志，三个审稿人两个同意，会不会悲剧呢？还请有经验的同学或老师给看看。 主编的回信如下： Your manuscript might be suitable for publication in ChemPhysChem. However, the criticism from the referees forces us to defer a final decision until you have considered their remarks and revised your manuscript accordingly. Please include a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments in the "Respond to Reviewers" box, including a list of changes made and a rebuttal to any comments with which you disagree. In addition, please highlight the changes made during revision - this will be a tremendous help to us and to the referees. In carrying out the revisions please try to ensure that the overall length of the paper does not increase significantly. If you think you might need more than about two weeks for the revisions, please let us know. We can then withdraw your manuscript so that you can work without the pressure of a deadline. You can then submit your revised manuscript later as a new manuscript with a reference to the earlier version and an explanation of the changes/additions etc. Please be assured that it will be treated exactly as we would a normal revised manuscript. After we receive your revised manuscript and response to the remarks from our referees, we will endeavor to make a decision on the acceptance or rejection of your article as soon as possible, though further refereeing may be required. We generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time. Therefore, please make full use of the first revision! |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有23人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有11人回复
-
读博
已经有4人回复
-
JMPT 期刊投稿流程
已经有4人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有5人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
等待小修后的答复
已经有48人回复- 论文中修，修回后退稿
已经有12人回复
- 青年基金会不会连续2年送到同一个评审人手里。
已经有23人回复
- 再求助一个尴尬事：论文接收，但是审稿人还有意见，需要改图。咋办
已经有8人回复
- 悲剧，发现投的论文里少写了个非常重要的条件，已经发外审了，会被直接拒稿吗？
已经有12人回复
- 一个拒稿，一个小修，再送审至哪个审稿人？
已经有7人回复
- 投稿投的有点毁三观啊，Nano Letters悲剧之后改投AM，希望会不会大一些呢？
已经有36人回复
- Decision in Process是什么意思，是不是悲剧的可能性很大？
已经有7人回复
- ETRI 有一个审稿人一直不回结果会怎样？
已经有19人回复
- Decision in Process 第4天了会不会悲剧？？？
已经有12人回复
- 小修变成了大修，会不会悲剧啊
已经有23人回复
- 论文两个审稿人让小修，一个审稿人拒绝，结果编辑拒稿了，这种情况还有希望吗？
已经有41人回复
- 概括一下个人基本情况，大家给点儿评论哈，悲剧的话也好现在就做好思想准备
已经有19人回复
- 审稿意见：一个大修，两个小修
已经有34人回复
- 小修没有完全回答审稿人意见，会不会悲剧啊？
已经有21人回复
- 稿件由”评审已审回“转为“终审“、”终审已审回“以后，再转为”评审已审回“？
已经有3人回复
- 两个高级，三个中级，青基这种梯队会不会被毙？
已经有25人回复
- 有比我更悲剧的吗？说说你最长审稿时间的一篇文章
已经有40人回复
3楼2015-04-21 21:17:52
wang_chuan
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 64 (初中生)
- 金币: 1786
- 散金: 1900
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 512
- 在线: 90.7小时
- 虫号: 953632
- 注册: 2010-02-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 人工智能与知识工程
2楼2015-04-21 20:46:08