24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

791414279

铜虫 (著名写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1681.1
散金: 6151
红花: 7
沙发: 1
帖子: 2092
在线: 209.9小时
虫号: 3271620
注册: 2014-06-13
专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的

[求助] Neurocomputing状态变为revise...已有6人参与

Neurocomputing状态变为revise...两个审稿人，第一个8条意见，第二个4条意见…改了几条，还有几条不好处理…求助大家啊…我这有12条意见的算不算大修？录用机会大吗？

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]

[ Last edited by 791414279 on 2015-4-8 at 00:23 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗已经有8人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有5人回复
论文投稿，期刊推荐已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有4人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷已经有14人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有5人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

neurocomputing状态变为Required Reviews Completed。。。已经有32人回复
编辑给了Revise and reconsider 已经有10人回复
Neurocomputing投稿登陆已经有5人回复
本人投elsevier的期刊，状态由小修变成了大修已经有10人回复
Elsevier 旗下期刊 Decision in process 状态10 天了是什么情况？已经有3人回复
neurocomputing投稿时的期刊类型怎么选择？已经有7人回复
neurocomputing投稿经验已经有6人回复
Neurocomputing的修改稿该如何提交已经有9人回复
寻Neurocomputing 模板已经有3人回复
投过neurocomputing的虫友进~ 已经有8人回复
Neurocomputing，这个是神马情况已经有23人回复
Elsevier的Neurocomputing 这是怎么回事呢已经有11人回复

1楼2015-04-07 13:36:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

791414279

铜虫 (著名写手)

应助: 3 (幼儿园)
金币: 1681.1
散金: 6151
红花: 7
沙发: 1
帖子: 2092
在线: 209.9小时
虫号: 3271620
注册: 2014-06-13
专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by zcyneu at 2015-04-08 08:00:43
帮你顶，哥们修咋样了？

1. My major concern is the lack detail in the results reported in Tables 1 to 3, and particularly the absence of any statistical analysis of these results. While 10 fold cross-validation has been used, the only results reported are the mean values achieved by each method across these 10 trials. No values are reported indicating the variance in algorithmic performance, either in terms of standard deviation or max/min values. Similarity there has been no testing of the statistical significance of the improvement in accuracy and reduction in number of genes observed for WDRSVM - such testing should be possible given that 10 trials have been run.
2. Reporting accuracy at a per-class level (ie true positives and true negatives) would also provide further insight into the performance of each method.
3. I also note that the fact that 10-fold validation was used was not immediately obvious, as the discussion as the initial discussion on lines 316-318 seemed to suggest that fixed training and testing samples were used, and this impression was not rectified until lines 339-340 - it would be useful to state this more clearly earlier in the paper.

拜托帮我看看吧。。。