| ²é¿´: 1555 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||||
chinaxiyang½ð³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
2009£2011ÄêFDA¾¯¸æÐÅÉæ¼°HPLCµÄÄÚÈÝ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
2009£2011ÄêFDA¾¯¸æÐÅÉæ¼°HPLCµÄÄÚÈÝ 2012-03-10 11:54:53| ·ÖÀࣺ 2009£2011ÄêFDA¾¯¸æÐÅÉæ¼°HPLCµÄÄÚÈÝ Å·ÃË·ûºÏÐÔÑо¿Ôº£¨ECA£©G¨¹nter Brendelberger²©Ê¿×òÌ죨2012Äê2ÔÂ28ÈÕ£©·¢²¼ÁË£º2009£2011ÄêFDA¾¯¸æÐÅÖÐÉæ¼°¸ßЧҺÏàÉ«Æ×·¨µÄÖ÷ÒªÎÊÌâ¡£ ÔÚʹÓøßЧҺÏàÉ«Æ×£¨HPLC£©´æÔڵĹؼüÎÊÌâ°üÀ¨ÒÔÏÂ4¸ö·½Ã棺 1.µç×ӼǼµÄÔʼÊý¾Ý/±£»¤ 2.У׼/È·ÈÏ 3.·½·¨ÑéÖ¤ 4.ϵͳµÄÊÊÓÃÐÔ/ÐòÁÐ ÔÎÄÁ´½Ó£º Go here to access the complete list of FDA findings regarding HPLC. È«²¿ÒëÎÄÈçÏ£º 2009¨C2011ÄêFDA¾¯¸æÐÅÉæ¼°HPLCµÄÄÚÈÝ 1. Raw Data / Protection of Electronic Records µç×ӼǼµÄÔʼÊý¾Ý/±£»¤ Your firm lacks systems to ensure that all electronic data generated in your Quality Control laboratory is secure and remains unaltered. All analysts have system administrator privileges that allow them to modify, overwrite, and delete original raw data files ¡ in the High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) units.¹ó¹«Ë¾È±·¦ÏµÍ³ÒÔÈ·±£ËùÓеÄÔÚÖÊÁ¿¿ØÖÆÊµÑéÊÒ²úÉúµÄµç×ÓÊý¾ÝÊǰ²È«µÄ²¢±£³Ö²»±ä¡£ÄãÃÇHPLC¸ÚλËùÓеķÖÎöÔ±¶¼¾ßÓÐϵͳ¹ÜÀíÔ±µÄȨÏÞÈ¥Ð޸쬏²¸Ç²¢É¾³ýÔʼÊý¾Ý¡£ There are no procedures that address the security measures in place for generation and modification of electronic data files for these instruments used for raw material, in-process,finished product and stability testing. In addition, your firm's review of laboratory data does not include a review of an audit trail or revision history to determine if unapproved changes have been made. ûÓн¨Á¢Ò»¸ö³ÌÐò¹æ¶¨ÈçºÎ¶ÔÔ²ÄÁÏ¡¢ÖÐ¼ä¿ØÖÆ¡¢³ÉÆ·ºÍÎȶ¨ÐÔ²âÊԵĵç×ÓÎļþ½øÐа²È«±£´æºÍÐ޸ġ£¹ó¹«Ë¾µÄʵÑéÊÒÊý¾ÝÉó²é²¢²»°üÀ¨É󼯏ú×Ù»òδ¾Åú×¼ÐÞ¸ÄÊý¾ÝµÄÀúÊ·¼Ç¼Éó²é¡£ For example,your firm has failed to periodically conduct back-up procedures This server was used to store, back-up, and/or archive raw test data from computer systems (Software:¡controlling and monitoring¡ High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems in accordance to SOP ¡¡±.ÀýÈç¹ó¹«Ë¾Î´Äܰ´SOPµÄÒªÇó¶Ô·þÎñÆ÷ÉÏ´æÖüµÄÔʼÊý¾Ý½øÐж¨ÆÚ±¸·Ý¡£ Your response, however, is inadequate because you fail to adequately address whether you were able to recover the critical data not backed-up between August 2010 and when you first implemented the daily backup process. Your firm has yet to indicate whether HPLC raw data records could be retrieved for the duration of time that the ¡ server was not backing-up the HPLC system data.ÄãÃǵĻظ´ÊDz»Êʵ±µÄ£¬ÒòΪÄãÃDz»Äܳä·ÖÐðÊö2010Äê8ÔÂÊÇ·ñ¶Ô¹Ø¼üÊý¾Ý½øÐÐÁ˱¸·Ý£¬2010Äê8ÔÂÊÇÄãÃǵÚÒ»´ÎÖ´Ðб¸·Ý³ÌÐò¡£¹ó¹«Ë¾»¹²»ÄܱíÃ÷ÄÜ·ñÕÒµ½ÄǶÎʱ¼äµÄHPLCÔʼÊý¾Ý£¬¡·þÎñÆ÷²»Ö§³Ö±¸·ÝHPLCϵͳÊý¾Ý¡£ Your firm's laboratory analysts have the ability to access and delete raw chromatographic data located on the ¡ of ¡ used to conduct HPLC testing. Due to this unrestrictive access, there is no assurance that laboratory records and raw data are accurate and valid.¹ó¹«Ë¾ÊµÑéÊÒ·ÖÎöÔ±¸ö¾ßÓзÃÎʺÍɾ³ýÔʼɫÆ×Êý¾ÝµÄȨÁ¦£¬ÄãÃÇÕâÖÖ²»ÊÜÏÞÖÆµÄ·ÃÎÊÎÞ·¨±£Ö¤ÊµÑé¼Ç¼ºÍÔʼÊý¾ÝµÄ׼ȷÐÔºÍÓÐЧÐÔ¡£ 2. Calibration / Qualification У׼/È·ÈÏ You replaced the ¡ HPLC systems operating on ¡ software with ¡ new qualified HPLC units from ¡ software. This validation information will be reviewed at the next inspection. In addition, your response is inadequate because it lacks a retrospective evaluation of the data from the former HPLC units.ÄãÃǻظ´Ëµ¸ü»»Á˸ßЧҺÏàÉ«Æ×ϵͳµÄ²Ù×÷Èí¼þ......ÎÒÃǽ«»áÔÚÏ´μì²éÖÐÈ·ÈÏÄãÃǽøÐеÄÑéÖ¤Ïà¹ØÎļþ¡£´ËÍ⣬ÄãÃǵĻظ´ÊDz»³ä×ãµÄ£¬ÒòΪȱ·¦¶Ô¹ýÈ¥PHLC¸ÚλÊý¾ÝµÄ»Ø¹ËÐÔÆÀ¼Û¡£ For the testing of incoming components, your firm failed to conduct HPLC system qualification using certified standards and validated procedures ¡ . Your laboratory failed to certify ¡ against a primary standard from an ccredited institution and/or to fully characterize the material as a standard.¶Ô½ø³§×é·Ý¼ìÑ飬¹ó¹«Ë¾²»ÄÜʹÓÃȨÍþ²¿Ãŵıê׼Ʒ¶ÔHPLCϵͳ½øÐÐÈ·ÈÏÓëÑéÖ¤¡£ÄãÃÇʵÑéÊÒδÄÜÖ¤Ã÷ÄãÃÇʹÓõıê׼ƷÊǺϷ¨ÐÔ£¬»ò´ÓÈϿɻú¹¹¹ºÖúÍ/»ò´ÓÓûù×¼±ê׼Ʒ±ê¶¨¹¤×÷±ê׼Ʒ¡£ Your firm failed to conduct injector and detector performance testing for the ¡ HPLC system. For example, no HPLC injector and detector testing for linearity, accuracy, and precision were conducted, such as: 1) various injection volumes and standard concentration testing; 2) evaluation of detector for noise/drift; and 3) carryover testing to evaluate response at low levels to determine the detection of possible interferences that may affect peaks of interest.¹ó¹«Ë¾Ã»ÓжÔHPLCµÄ×¢ÑùÆ÷ºÍ¼ì²âÆ÷½øÐÐÐÔÄܲâÊÔ¡£ÀýÈ磬ûÓжÔHPLC×¢ÑùÆ÷ºÍ¼ì²âÆ÷½øÐÐÏßÐÔ£¬×¼È·¶È£¬¾«¶È¶ÈÈ·ÈÏ¡£ÀýÈ磺1£©²»Í¬×¢ÉäÁ¿ºÍ±ê×¼ÒºµÄ²âÊÔ£»2£©¶Ô¼ì²âÆ÷µÄÔëÒô/Æ¯ÒÆÆÀ¹À£»3£©²ÐÁôÊÔÑ飬À´ÆÀ¹ÀµÍ·åÏìӦʱ£¬È·¶¨¿É¼ì²â³ö¿ÉÄܸÉÈÅÖ÷·åµÄ²ÐÁô¡£ Your HPLC calibration lacks a carry over test (sample injection residual test), sample energy (intensity of light source), and lamp use hours determination.ÄãÃǵÄHPLCУ׼ȱÉÙ½øÑù²ÐÁôÊÔÑ飬ÄÜÔ´£¨¹âÔ´Ç¿¶È£©£¬µÆÅÝʹÓÃʱ¼äµÄ²â¶¨ÄÚÈÝ¡£ Your firm also fails to maintain raw data associated with the re-qualification and calibration of your laboratory instruments. During the inspection the investigators were informed that the annual re-qualification and calibration of your laboratory equipment (e.g., HPLC, GC, polarimeter, and analytical balance) is performed by the ¡ . However, you were unable to provide raw data or documentation regarding the qualification and calibration of your instruments and data to demonstrate that your quality unit reviewed and approved the work performed by your contractor. ¹ó¹«Ë¾²»ÄܶÔʵÑéÊÒÒÇÆ÷½øÐÐÖØÐÂÈ·ÈϺÍУ׼À´Î¬»¤ÔʼÊý¾Ý¡£ÔÚ¿¼²ìÆÚ¼äµ÷²éÔ±ÒªÇóÄãÃÇÒª¶ÔʵÑéÊÒÉ豸½øÐÐÄê¶ÈÖØÐÂÈ·ÈϺÍУ׼£¨ÀýÈ磬¸ßЧҺÏàÉ«Æ×ÒÇ£¬ÆøÏàÉ«Æ×£¬Ðý¹âÒÇ£¬·ÖÎöÌìÆ½£©£¬È»¶øÄãÃÇÎÞ·¨Ìá¹©ÖØÐÂÈ·ÈϺÍУ׼µÄÔʼÊý¾Ý»òÎļþºÍÖÊÁ¿²¿ÃÅÉóºËÎļþ£¬ºÍ³Ð°üÉÌÉó²éµÄÅú×¼Îļþ¡£ 3. Method Validation ·½·¨ÑéÖ¤ Your firm failed to generate and document chromatographic data to support the validation of the analytical method .. used for the determination of Urea in Urea Cream 40%. In addition, your firm failed to generate a and document chromatographic data to support stress studies ¡to demonstrate that the method is suitable for determining stability.¹ó¹«Ë¾Ã»ÓÐÉ«Æ×Êý¾ÝÀ´Ö§³Ö·ÖÎö·½·¨µÄÑéÖ¤......¸Ã·½·¨ÓÃÓÚ40£¥ÄòËØËªµÄ²â¶¨¡£´ËÍ⣬¹ó¹«Ë¾Ã»ÓÐÉ«Æ×Êý¾ÝÀ´Ö§³Ö½µ½âʵÑéÑо¿ºÍ¸Ã·½·¨ÊÇ·ñÊÊÓÃÓÚÎȶ¨ÐÔÑо¿¡£ Your firm has not verified that the preservatives and API test methods using the ¡ System is adequate for its intended use. The ¡ system is different from the previously used ¡ HPLC system in make, model, and column. In addition, your analysis of ¡ in finished product does not identify the maximum adjustment in mobile phase to obtain a suitable resolution between peaks ¡ .¹ó¹«Ë¾Ã»ÓÐÈ·ÈÏÒòʹÓò»Í¬HPLCÒÇÆ÷¡¢Ðͺš¢Öù×Óʱ²â¶¨·À¸¯¼ÁºÍAPI·½·¨ÊÇ·ñÊʵ±¡£´ËÍ⣬¶Ôij֯¼ÁµÄ·ÖÎö·½·¨Ã»ÓÐÈ·ÈÏÁ÷¶¯ÏàµÄ×î´óµ÷ÕûÁ¿´Ó¶ø»ñµÃºÏÊʵķÖÀë¶È¡£ You failed to include testing for method precision and ruggedness in your HPLC Assay Method Validation ¡ . We are concerned that you have not established the degree of reproducibility or repeatability of the analytical procedure under normal operating conditions. In addition, you failed to establish adequate system suitability parameters to ensure that the complete testing system (including instrument, reagents, columns, and analysts) continues to operate suitably for the intended application.ÔÚHPLC·ÖÎö·½·¨ÑéÖ¤ÖУ¬ÄãÃÇûÓаüÀ¨¾«¶È¶ÈºÍÄÍÓÃÐÔÑéÖ¤....ÎÒÃǹØ×¢µÄÊÇÄãÃDz»Äܽ¨Á¢ÔÚÕý³£Ìõ¼þÏÂÖØ¸´ÐÔ»òÖØ¸´ÐÔÏÞ¶ÈÒªÇó¡£´ËÍ⣬ÄãÃÇ»¹Ã»Óн¨Á¢×ã¹»µÄϵͳÊÊÓÃÐÔ²ÎÊýÀ´È·±£¸Ã²âÊÔϵͳ£¨°üÀ¨ÒÇÆ÷£¬ÊÔ¼Á£¬ÖùºÍ·ÖÎöʦ£©·ûºÏÔ¤ÆÚµÄÓÃ;¡£ Your firm failed to include the following characteristics: accuracy, robustness, ruggedness and specificity in your validation of the HPLC assay method ¡ used for the analysis of Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6), Riboflavin 5' Phosphate Sodium (Vitamin B2) and Thiamine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B1) in Poly-Vitamin Drop products.ÔÚÄãÃǵÄHPLC·ÖÎö·½·¨ÑéÖ¤ÖÐȱÉÙ׼ȷ¶È£¬ÄÍÓÃÐÔ£¬ÔÙÏÖÐÔºÍרÊôÐÔµÄÑéÖ¤£¬¸Ã·½·¨ÓÃÓڲⶨÔÚ¾ÛάµÎ¼Á²úÆ·ÖÐάÉúËØB6¡¢ºË»ÆËØÎ¬ÉúËØB2¡¢Î¬ÉúËØB1µÄ²â¶¨¡£ 4. System Suitability / SequencesϵͳµÄÊÊÓÃÐÔ/ÐòÁÐ Your GC and HPLC analyses for both finished products and raw materials lack appropriate system suitability determinations. Your SOP ¡ each specify three standard solution injections. Both methods are used for testing of drug products at batch release and during stability study.ÄãÃǵÄGCºÍHPLCÔÚ³ÉÆ·ºÍÔÁϵIJⶨÖÐȱ·¦Êʵ±µÄϵͳÊÊÓÃÐÔʵÑ飬ÕâÁ½ÖÖ·½·¨¶¼ÓÃÓÚÒ©Æ·µÄ·ÅÐмì²âºÍÎȶ¨ÐÔÑо¿¡£ Our concern is that you may not be evaluating the signal to noise ratio during system suitability. Evaluation of the signal to noise ratio during system suitability is a normal laboratory practice when testing low level impurities or degradant content by HPLC.ÎÒÃǹØ×¢µÄÊÇÄãÃÇ¿ÉÄÜδÔÚϵͳÊÊÓ¦ÐÔÖÐÆÀ¹ÀÐÅÔë±È¡£µ±ÓÃHPLC ¼ì²âµÍº¬Á¿µÄÔÓÖʺͽµ½â²úÎïʱ£¬Í¨³£ÔÚϵͳÊÊÓ¦ÐÔÖÐÆÀ¹ÀÐÅÔë±È¡£ Failure to ensure that approved test procedures for ¡. HPLC are followed. For example, the inspection found no scientific justification for the current sequence of chromatographic injections performed, which is different to the sequence included in the approved analytical method.ûÓÐ×ñÊØÒÑÅú×¼µÄHPLC³ÌÐòÒªÇó½øÐмì²â£¬ÀýÈçÔÚ¼ì²éÖз¢ÏÖ²Ù×÷ÕßʹÓÃûÓÐÈκοÆÑ§µÀÀíµÄÉ«Æ×½øÑùÐòÁУ¬Ò²¸úÅú×¼µÄ·ÖÎöÐòÁв»Í¬¡£ We remain concerned about current laboratory practices, in that not all injection results are being reported. For example, the assay test for lots ¡ failed to include all the injection results performed as part of the chromatographic run. Your response provides no explanation regarding why analytical results are selectively reported. ÎÒÃÇÈÔÈ»¹Ø×¢Ä¿Ç°ÄãÃÇʵÑéÊÒ»¹´æÔÚûÓб»·¢ÏֵįäËü×ö·¨¡£ÀýÈçºÜ¶àº¬Á¿²âÊÔûÓаüÀ¨Êµ¼ÊÔËÐнøÑùµÄËùÓÐÉ«Æ×½á¹û¡£ÄãÃǵĻظ´Ò²Ã»ÓнâÊÍΪʲôѡÔñÐÔʹÓÃÉ«Æ×·ÖÎö½á¹û¡£ Your system suitability test requires that ¡ injections of standard be performed and that a Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of ¡ % be met in order for the test to be acceptable. This acceptance criterion is contrary to the USP requirement chapter <621>. During our inspection, you were unable to provide validation data to support your current RSD criteria. Your response is inadequate in that you failed to provide scientific rationale to justify the change in your analytical method for system suitability requirements. In response to this letter, please provide a valid % RSD and the analytical data to support it.ÄãÃǵÄϵͳÊÊÓÃÐÔʵÑéÒªÇó¡×¢Éä±ê×¼Òº¼ÆËãRSDÒÔ·ûºÏ½ÓÊܱê×¼£¬Õâ¸ö½ÓÊܱê×¼ÓëUSPͨÓÃÒªÇó<621>Ïà·´¡£ÔÚÎÒÃǼì²éÆÚ¼ä£¬ÄãÃDz»ÄÜÌṩÑéÖ¤Êý¾ÝÀ´Ö§³ÖÄãÃǵ±Ç°µÄRSD½ÓÊܱê×¼¡£ÄãÃǵĻظ´ÊDz»³ä·ÖµÄ£¬Ã»ÓÐÌṩ¿ÆÑ§µÄÒÀ¾ÝÖ¤Ã÷±ä¸ü·½·¨µÄϵͳÊÊÓÃÐÔʵÑéÒªÇó¡£ÔÚÕâ¸ö»Ø¸´ÐÅÖÐÇëÄãÃÇÌṩÓÐЧ֤µÄRSDºÍ·ÖÎöÊý¾ÝÀ´Ö§³Ö¡£ |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
ÔÁÏÒ© |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤304ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§336·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
[¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á]Î÷ÄϿƼ¼´óѧ¹ú·À/²ÄÁϵ¼Ê¦ÍƼö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì321·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
211±¾£¬11408Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖпÆÔº277·Ö£¬ÔøÔÚÖпÆÔº×Ô¶¯»¯Ëùʵϰ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¶«ÄÏ´óѧ364Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¹ú×Ô¿ÆÃæÉÏ»ù½ð×ÖÌå
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ҩѧ383 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
²»ÖªµÀ´ó¼ÒÖª²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎÔÚFDA¹ÙÍøÉϲéѯ×îеľ¯¸æÐÅ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
¹«Ë¾µÄFDAÉó¼Æ×ÜËã¸æÒ»¶ÎÂäÁË
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´

sonia2008
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 810.3
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 90
- ÔÚÏß: 163Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1829205
- ×¢²á: 2012-05-22
- רҵ: ʳƷ¿ÆÑ§»ù´¡

2Â¥2015-08-12 09:51:59













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥




20