| 查看: 5298 | 回复: 42 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
大懒虫1106木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
Analytical Chemistry一大修一小修,修改后重审被拒,申诉
|
||
|
如题:Analytical Chemistry一大修一小修,修回后返回给给大修的那个审稿人手里,结构给退了,然后申诉,编辑于申诉的第二天给了重投的解决,下面使编辑几次修改意见,请各位有经验的虫虫们,看看重投中的机会大不大? 27-Jan-2015 Journal: Analytical Chemistry Manuscript ID: ******** Title:***** Author(s): ****** Dear ****: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Analytical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have concluded that the work is of potential interest to the readership of Analytical Chemistry. However, based on the comments received, it is clear that major revision of this manuscript will be required before a decision can be made on its publication. I will be pleased to consider a revised manuscript that addresses the reviewers' concerns. Your revised manuscript may be returned to one or more of the original reviewers, along with your itemized response to the reviewers’ comments. 重审给出的意见 17-Feb-2015 Journal: Analytical Chemistry Manuscript ID: ********** Title: ****** Author(s): ***** Dear ****: I am reporting on the above revised manuscript, which you recently submitted for consideration in Analytical Chemistry. After a careful study of the manuscript and considering the previous reviewer's comments, I regret to inform you that I have decided against publication. The potential usefulness of your work is not in question. However, in light of the reviewer's evaluation and comments, I do not believe that publication is justified. I hope you will find the reviewers' specific comments helpful in planning future work. These comments are either included here or, if they were given in the form of a file, will appear at the bottom of the copy of this letter which will appear and be stored in your Author Center. I appreciate the opportunity to have considered this contribution, and thank you for your interest in Analytical Chemistry. 2015-02-23申诉给出的结论 Dear ****: The decision on your manuscript has been reversed. Please resubmit your revised manuscript to our editorial office. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have expressed serious reservations about this work that I do not believe can be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Analytical Chemistry in its present form. Although I am rejecting this version of your manuscript, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees’ concerns in full, I am willing to consider a resubmitted manuscript (assuming no related data is published in the interim). The content of the new manuscript should address the prior reviewers' comments and a point-by-point response to their concerns must accompany the resubmission. Your manuscript will be handled as a new submission and may be subject to a complete review process. It may also be sent to one or more of the original reviewers, along with your itemized response to the reviewers’ comments. The option to resubmit your manuscript will be available on your ACS Paragon Plus homepage until 25-May-2015. Please ensure that your manuscript fully conforms to the submission/format requirements outlined in the author guidelines: http://pubs.acs.org/page/ancham/submission/index.html. Should you decide to resubmit, please include a highlighted/tracked changes version showing the changes made, designated as "Supporting Information for Review Only". I do not require a highlighted version of Supporting Information for Publication (if applicable); this must be uploaded as a clean copy. ACS Publications uses CrossCheck's iThenticate software to detect instances of similarity in submitted manuscripts. In publishing only original research, ACS is committed to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. Your manuscript may be screened for similarity to published material. I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you. Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Analytical Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work. With sincere regards, [ Last edited by 大懒虫1106 on 2015-2-25 at 12:01 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有15人回复
心脉受损
已经有4人回复
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
读博
已经有3人回复
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊,第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有9人回复
到新单位后,换了新的研究方向,没有团队,持续积累2区以上论文,能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有5人回复
shenai137
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 179 (高中生)
- 金币: 1387.2
- 散金: 800
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 514
- 在线: 85.8小时
- 虫号: 2030317
- 注册: 2012-09-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
19楼2015-02-24 13:16:56
★
大懒虫1106(金币+1): 谢谢参与
大懒虫1106(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2015-02-24 12:39:24













回复此楼