| 查看: 5844 | 回复: 42 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
大懒虫1106木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
Analytical Chemistry一大修一小修，修改后重审被拒，申诉
|
||
|
如题：Analytical Chemistry一大修一小修，修回后返回给给大修的那个审稿人手里，结构给退了，然后申诉，编辑于申诉的第二天给了重投的解决，下面使编辑几次修改意见，请各位有经验的虫虫们，看看重投中的机会大不大？ 27-Jan-2015 Journal: Analytical Chemistry Manuscript ID: ******** Title:***** Author(s): ****** Dear ****: Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Analytical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have concluded that the work is of potential interest to the readership of Analytical Chemistry. However, based on the comments received, it is clear that major revision of this manuscript will be required before a decision can be made on its publication. I will be pleased to consider a revised manuscript that addresses the reviewers' concerns. Your revised manuscript may be returned to one or more of the original reviewers, along with your itemized response to the reviewers’ comments. 重审给出的意见 17-Feb-2015 Journal: Analytical Chemistry Manuscript ID: ********** Title: ****** Author(s): ***** Dear ****: I am reporting on the above revised manuscript, which you recently submitted for consideration in Analytical Chemistry. After a careful study of the manuscript and considering the previous reviewer's comments, I regret to inform you that I have decided against publication. The potential usefulness of your work is not in question. However, in light of the reviewer's evaluation and comments, I do not believe that publication is justified. I hope you will find the reviewers' specific comments helpful in planning future work. These comments are either included here or, if they were given in the form of a file, will appear at the bottom of the copy of this letter which will appear and be stored in your Author Center. I appreciate the opportunity to have considered this contribution, and thank you for your interest in Analytical Chemistry. 2015-02-23申诉给出的结论 Dear ****: The decision on your manuscript has been reversed. Please resubmit your revised manuscript to our editorial office. It has been examined by expert reviewers who have expressed serious reservations about this work that I do not believe can be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Analytical Chemistry in its present form. Although I am rejecting this version of your manuscript, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees’ concerns in full, I am willing to consider a resubmitted manuscript (assuming no related data is published in the interim). The content of the new manuscript should address the prior reviewers' comments and a point-by-point response to their concerns must accompany the resubmission. Your manuscript will be handled as a new submission and may be subject to a complete review process. It may also be sent to one or more of the original reviewers, along with your itemized response to the reviewers’ comments. The option to resubmit your manuscript will be available on your ACS Paragon Plus homepage until 25-May-2015. Please ensure that your manuscript fully conforms to the submission/format requirements outlined in the author guidelines: http://pubs.acs.org/page/ancham/submission/index.html. Should you decide to resubmit, please include a highlighted/tracked changes version showing the changes made, designated as "Supporting Information for Review Only". I do not require a highlighted version of Supporting Information for Publication (if applicable); this must be uploaded as a clean copy. ACS Publications uses CrossCheck's iThenticate software to detect instances of similarity in submitted manuscripts. In publishing only original research, ACS is committed to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. Your manuscript may be screened for similarity to published material. I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you. Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Analytical Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work. With sincere regards, [ Last edited by 大懒虫1106 on 2015-2-25 at 12:01 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0854求调剂
已经有27人回复
-
材料相关专业344求调剂双非工科学校或课题组
已经有27人回复
-
300求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
一志愿沪9，326求生物学调剂
已经有12人回复
-
生物学调剂
已经有10人回复
-
320求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
接受任何调剂
已经有7人回复
-
化学070300 求调剂
已经有29人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- analytical and bioanalytical chemistry投稿求助
已经有4人回复
- 请问这是被拒了吗？改后还能重投吗？
已经有10人回复
- analytical letters 审稿人意见
已经有8人回复
- 有人投过Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry么？
已经有3人回复
- 投到arxiv上的文章可以投到chemistry of material上吗？
已经有9人回复
- Analytical methods 与Analytical letters投哪个好中？谢谢。
已经有7人回复
- Nature Materials拒了投Nature Chemistry有戏吗？
已经有3人回复
- analytical chemistry投稿
已经有10人回复
- Analytical Chemistry投稿求助
已经有7人回复
- 求助Analytical Chemistry的改投还是重投？technical note改成article？
已经有7人回复
- 改论文成short communication重投，投后以不符合要求被拒，还可以再次缩写后重投吗？
已经有9人回复
- 投JACS （communication） 遇到这种情况可以再重投吗？
已经有56人回复
- analytical and bioanalytical chemistry格式要求
已经有7人回复
- 投稿被拒 能否修改后继续投同一个
已经有9人回复
- 投Analytical Chemistry的文章居然因为英语问题被拒，为什么？
已经有13人回复
- 投Analytical Chemistry的文章Has been sent for review。非常非常希望有个好结果啊。
已经有62人回复
- 怎么办啊？投Green Chemistry被拒，后投 OBC 再拒，怎么办啊?
已经有10人回复
- 被拒后，可以重投吗？
已经有6人回复
- 有没有给analytical and bioanalytical chemistry审过稿的？
已经有5人回复
- analytical chemistry难发吗
已经有8人回复
- 有人投过Journal of Analytical Chemistry吗
已经有9人回复
- 美国化学会的Analytical Chemistry的审稿周期一般是多长时间？
已经有38人回复
★
大懒虫1106(金币+1): 谢谢参与
大懒虫1106(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2015-02-24 12:39:24
