24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1379  |  回复: 7

yuqianjiao

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 求助给位前辈,看看我的文章接收的可能性

下面是编辑的回信:
We now have referees' comments on the above paper.
I am pleased to tell you that the work is of interest, but significant modifications are required in order to address the referees' comments, which are included below and in the attached file. In addition to the referees comments, I note that the list of references is far too short for a scholarly research article. Please ensure that you have referred to all relevant prior research before submitting a revised manuscript.
两个审稿人,一个审稿人意见很好,但是另一个人给的意见很不好,有点默拒的意思,他应该没太仔细看或者没看懂,说我没考虑什么什么,其实我是有的,估计他就因为这一点就说我文章不正确并且深度不够,当然也就没有什么修改意见了。
最后的状态是return for major rewriting。所以想请问各位前辈,因为这样的话comments就比较少,这种情况下怎么修改,接受的可能性大么?谢谢~在线等~~
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

伤哒心

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
yuqianjiao(zhlnwpu代发): 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-02-14 10:53:00
看到pleased我就觉得录用几率很大,好好改,comments比较少就多解释,态度要好。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

走别人的路,让别人无路可走
2楼2015-02-14 10:42:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangyigfkd

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
yuqianjiao(zhlnwpu代发): 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-02-14 10:53:11
编辑让改就有机会。反正我是只要给改的机会最终都能中。
好好回复没太看懂你文章的审稿人,要有理有据,补充相关文献,态度一定要诚恳!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2015-02-14 10:44:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuqianjiao

新虫 (初入文坛)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 伤哒心 at 2015-02-14 10:42:49
看到pleased我就觉得录用几率很大,好好改,comments比较少就多解释,态度要好。

谢谢前辈,下面是第二个人的审稿意见
The standard of written English is rather poor.  There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam.  I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate.  
I also believe their analysis is incorrect.  For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces?
真是相当的差啊,是因为我英语写的很差导致他看不懂?说我的分析错误,没考虑reaction forcess明显就是没看懂或者没看完。。。这是不是导致他这么差评价的原因啊?我总感觉我修改了这人也不会满意。。。sigh!
4楼2015-02-14 16:06:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuqianjiao

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by wangyigfkd at 2015-02-14 10:44:45
编辑让改就有机会。反正我是只要给改的机会最终都能中。
好好回复没太看懂你文章的审稿人,要有理有据,补充相关文献,态度一定要诚恳!

谢谢前辈,下面是第二个人的审稿意见
The standard of written English is rather poor.  There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam.  I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate.  
I also believe their analysis is incorrect.  For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces?
真是相当的差啊,是因为我英语写的很差导致他看不懂?说我的分析错误,没考虑reaction forcess明显就是没看懂或者没看完。。。这是不是导致他这么差评价的原因啊?我总感觉我修改了这人也不会满意。。。sigh!
5楼2015-02-14 16:08:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jbhu220

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
应该很有希望,看起来是小修,好好改吧
6楼2015-02-14 16:15:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sdgame

禁虫 (知名作家)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

7楼2015-02-14 16:58:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

shenai137

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑让改就说明很有机会。给没太看懂你文章的审稿人好好解释清楚,态度一定要诚恳,把英语好好润色一下,祝你好运
8楼2015-02-14 17:36:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yuqianjiao 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见