24小时热门版块排行榜    

Znn3bq.jpeg
查看: 1149  |  回复: 14
【奖励】 本帖被评价11次,作者westyouday增加金币 10.5
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

westyouday

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


[资源] 推荐《Physical Chemistry, Third Edition》

Physical Chemistry, Third Edition
By Robert G. Mortimer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Publisher:   Academic Press
Number Of Pages:   1392
Publication Date:   2008-03-26
ISBN-10 / ASIN:   0123706173
ISBN-13 / EAN:   9780123706171
Binding:   Hardcover


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Product Description:

In this third edition, core applications have been added along with more recent developments in the theories of chemical reaction kinetics and molecular quantum mechanics, as well as in the experimental study of extremely rapid chemical reactions.

* Fully revised concise edition covering recent developments in the field
* Clear and comprehensive text ideal for undergraduate and graduate course study
* Encourages readers to apply theory in practical situations




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: Absolutely horrible book for a wonderful subject
Rating: 1

I have just seen that fate is cruel enough to allow a new edition of Mortimer to be used on unsuspecting students and instructors. I am writing this to urgently warn people not to adopt this book and to reinforce the other disapproving reviews before mine.

How do I begin a review of such a terrible textbook, easily the worst that I have ever read during my college years. First, I want to say that I like physical chemistry a lot, so it is not the subject matter that bothers me. The reviewers before me are right on the money. Everything about this book is sloppy, uninspired, and downright dreadful. Anybody who says that this book is good is either seriously delusional or is a lying sack of s***.

The thing that bothers me most is that Mortimer seems to always choose the most non-intuitive, the most complicated method to explain concepts. For example, when he explains the Second Law, he talks in some detail about Pfaffian forms, as if the students are expected to understand that level of mathematics. Are you kidding me? Even high-level thermo texts like Denbigh and Callen shy away from that approach.

I eventually borrowed other physical chemisty books from the library and read them instead, and I promptly sold away Mortimer after p-chem was over. I strongly suggest other students who are forced to use this book to do the same. To the instructors: please save students the money of buying this trash.



Summary: This text is terrible option for learning this subject!!
Rating: 1

Robert Mortimer's attempt at which students "first have the opportunity to synthesize what they have learned in math, physics, and chemistry course into a coherent pattern of knowledge" (the author's very own words) is a complete disaster in this book. On page 595, I quit counting the errors in math and typos because there were just too many...and the book has over 1100 pages! You have to double check almost every thing you read, because the mistakes are so numberous it becomes a futile exercise in disbelief. This book is a nightmare. The author bounces literally all over topics, almost as though he is randomly spouting out lines and titles to impress you, instead of following a schedule or format of anything. This random topic technique selection is often used by those who just do not know their subject matter that well, and I am sorry to say, but this book just is not good. He may well be the smartest chemist on planet earth, but if the book is the best he can do, then I doubt it. But what he forgets, is that anyone taking P-Chem is wise to this. P-Chem guys are the top of the top, and they can see through this fog of tarmac. In graduate schoool, my advanced Physical Chemistry book was almost as bad as this one, so I used two other ones, one by Arno L. to be precise. The thing is that, physical chemistry can be one of the best courses and subjects in the entire spectrum of science. It is challenging, everyone knows this. But the subject is for those top students of the field anyway, and they should love it. Physical chemistry if done correctly, will win over students and make them into specialists not often found in other majors. Remember, this is probably the most difficult title in chemistry, and you need a good text to guide you along. You are not going to get much help with Mortimer's attempt. If you are at this level, please don't pretend you know quantum mechanics --if you don't --and it is very obvious the author is very unconfortable dealing in most of it. I honestly do not know how this got published as a college textbook with the incoherent way and number of mistakes printed...and this is the 2nd Edition. Maybe it was the illustrations. There is a passage here and there, that at times, seems to be written quite well. One such one, is the description of circular dichroism and ORD. But overall, I cannot recommend this book because of the poor quality written nature and just mistake after mistake it presents. guyairey



Summary: Honestly the worst chemistry textbook I've ever had.
Rating: 1

First, this book is almost no help to me at all besides the referencing of equations. The explanations are not helpful and there are typos in each chapter. Mortimer has a knack for making even the simplest concepts difficult to understand with the way he writes. Some of the examples are helpful, but these are few. The book mainly does derivations of equations.

I am taking an inorganic chemistry class at the same time as this physical chemistry class. Sometimes when I read my inorganic chemistry book, it explains some of the physical chemistry topics better than the physical chemistry book itself. I think that's pretty sad. Or I can go online, and it's often easier to find an online article explaining a concept well, rather than trying to understand the poorly worded explanations in this book.

The only positive thing about this book that I can think of is that it seems to be very inclusive of a wide number of concepts and equations, and could make an okay reference book. However, there are often equations with typos in them. For example, one equation had some variables raised to the 1/2 power. Right beneath that, there was an example using the very same equation with the variables raised to the 3/2 power, not 1/2. Obviously a typo. Just one of many. Up till I had this book, I had always understood, or at least partially understood all the chemistry textbooks I've read. Like the title of this review says, this is honestly the worst chem textbook I've ever had.



Summary: Needs lots of work
Rating: 2

This book seems to have passed through the editing stage without actually being edited. There are at least 4-5 typos in each chapter. It takes longer to figure out what the questions are asking than it does to actually do the questions. Whoever solved the problems and put answers in the back did the majority of them incorrectly, because the answers are wrong. In the chapters themselves, the wording is unclear and confusing. I would highly recommmend checking out other P-Chem books before purchasing this one.


下载链接
http://www.filefactory.com/file/ ... gapedia.info__.html
http://rapidshare.com/files/1069 ... gapedia.info__.html
解压密码
PHYCHETE.rar@tF
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lezailyf

木虫 (正式写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

想找本英文版物理化学的书好久了 写了
9楼2008-09-26 14:19:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答

Quan.

金虫 (文坛精英)


【评价】★★★★★ (五星级,优秀推荐)
顶顶好书!!!
3楼2008-05-22 21:08:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lishitong123

铜虫 (小有名气)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4楼2008-05-23 00:57:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gwxgwc

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

非常好的书,不顶不行啊
6楼2008-06-01 23:54:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 290求调剂 +13 luoziheng 2026-04-10 13/650 2026-04-11 23:15 by labixiaoqiao
[考研] 电子信息279求调剂,有书读就行 +8 wwwooden 2026-04-08 11/550 2026-04-11 20:22 by cq2548
[考研] 求调剂 +10 璃茉一定上岸 2026-04-10 10/500 2026-04-11 13:31 by 1005715100
[考研] 0859,337求调剂 +4 研s. 2026-04-10 4/200 2026-04-11 11:34 by caotw2020
[考研] 298求调剂 +5 残荷新柳 2026-04-07 5/250 2026-04-11 11:02 by 紫曦紫棋
[考研] 288求调剂 +15 代fish 2026-04-09 16/800 2026-04-11 10:26 by wwj2530616
[考研] 263能源动力专硕求调剂 +3 加大号饭盒袋 2026-04-10 3/150 2026-04-10 22:23 by 286640313
[考研] 22408 366分,本科211,一志愿西工大 +4 Rubt 2026-04-09 4/200 2026-04-10 19:51 by chemisry
[考研] 一志愿矿大,材料工程专硕314分,0856可调都可以 +15 无懈可击的巨人 2026-04-09 15/750 2026-04-10 18:10 by hmn_wj
[考研] 0856专硕求调剂 希望是a区院校 +21 好好休息好不好 2026-04-09 24/1200 2026-04-10 16:58 by luoyongfeng
[考研] 调剂 +24 不逢春 2026-04-07 25/1250 2026-04-10 09:39 by 690616278
[考研] 085601初试330分找调剂 +10 流心奶黄包l 2026-04-09 10/500 2026-04-10 08:14 by Sammy2
[考研] 一志愿2110,化学学硕310分,本科重点双非求调剂 +18 努力奋斗112 2026-04-08 18/900 2026-04-09 23:28 by wolf97
[考研] 一志愿鲁东大学071000生物学学硕初试分数276求调剂 +3 慕绝cc 2026-04-09 3/150 2026-04-09 09:57 by liuhuiying09
[考研] 286求调剂 +19 Faune 2026-04-08 20/1000 2026-04-09 08:36 by 哦哦123
[考研] 316求调剂 +4 15318418673 2026-04-07 4/200 2026-04-07 22:12 by hemengdong
[考研] 生物调剂 +5 橙子橙子橙子啊 2026-04-05 9/450 2026-04-07 15:31 by 上岸快快
[考研] 22408 318分求调剂 +4 勤奋的小笼包 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-07 15:05 by 纸鹤555
[考研] 285求调剂 +5 mapmath 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-06 17:18 by 蓝云思雨
[考研] 求调剂 +7 张.1 2026-04-05 7/350 2026-04-05 20:40 by 啵啵啵0119
信息提示
请填处理意见