| 查看: 1222 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价11次，作者westyouday增加金币 10.5 个 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[资源]
推荐《Physical Chemistry, Third Edition》
|
|||
|
Physical Chemistry, Third Edition By Robert G. Mortimer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Publisher: Academic Press Number Of Pages: 1392 Publication Date: 2008-03-26 ISBN-10 / ASIN: 0123706173 ISBN-13 / EAN: 9780123706171 Binding: Hardcover -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product Description: In this third edition, core applications have been added along with more recent developments in the theories of chemical reaction kinetics and molecular quantum mechanics, as well as in the experimental study of extremely rapid chemical reactions. * Fully revised concise edition covering recent developments in the field * Clear and comprehensive text ideal for undergraduate and graduate course study * Encourages readers to apply theory in practical situations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: Absolutely horrible book for a wonderful subject Rating: 1 I have just seen that fate is cruel enough to allow a new edition of Mortimer to be used on unsuspecting students and instructors. I am writing this to urgently warn people not to adopt this book and to reinforce the other disapproving reviews before mine. How do I begin a review of such a terrible textbook, easily the worst that I have ever read during my college years. First, I want to say that I like physical chemistry a lot, so it is not the subject matter that bothers me. The reviewers before me are right on the money. Everything about this book is sloppy, uninspired, and downright dreadful. Anybody who says that this book is good is either seriously delusional or is a lying sack of s***. The thing that bothers me most is that Mortimer seems to always choose the most non-intuitive, the most complicated method to explain concepts. For example, when he explains the Second Law, he talks in some detail about Pfaffian forms, as if the students are expected to understand that level of mathematics. Are you kidding me? Even high-level thermo texts like Denbigh and Callen shy away from that approach. I eventually borrowed other physical chemisty books from the library and read them instead, and I promptly sold away Mortimer after p-chem was over. I strongly suggest other students who are forced to use this book to do the same. To the instructors: please save students the money of buying this trash. Summary: This text is terrible option for learning this subject!! Rating: 1 Robert Mortimer's attempt at which students "first have the opportunity to synthesize what they have learned in math, physics, and chemistry course into a coherent pattern of knowledge" (the author's very own words) is a complete disaster in this book. On page 595, I quit counting the errors in math and typos because there were just too many...and the book has over 1100 pages! You have to double check almost every thing you read, because the mistakes are so numberous it becomes a futile exercise in disbelief. This book is a nightmare. The author bounces literally all over topics, almost as though he is randomly spouting out lines and titles to impress you, instead of following a schedule or format of anything. This random topic technique selection is often used by those who just do not know their subject matter that well, and I am sorry to say, but this book just is not good. He may well be the smartest chemist on planet earth, but if the book is the best he can do, then I doubt it. But what he forgets, is that anyone taking P-Chem is wise to this. P-Chem guys are the top of the top, and they can see through this fog of tarmac. In graduate schoool, my advanced Physical Chemistry book was almost as bad as this one, so I used two other ones, one by Arno L. to be precise. The thing is that, physical chemistry can be one of the best courses and subjects in the entire spectrum of science. It is challenging, everyone knows this. But the subject is for those top students of the field anyway, and they should love it. Physical chemistry if done correctly, will win over students and make them into specialists not often found in other majors. Remember, this is probably the most difficult title in chemistry, and you need a good text to guide you along. You are not going to get much help with Mortimer's attempt. If you are at this level, please don't pretend you know quantum mechanics --if you don't --and it is very obvious the author is very unconfortable dealing in most of it. I honestly do not know how this got published as a college textbook with the incoherent way and number of mistakes printed...and this is the 2nd Edition. Maybe it was the illustrations. There is a passage here and there, that at times, seems to be written quite well. One such one, is the description of circular dichroism and ORD. But overall, I cannot recommend this book because of the poor quality written nature and just mistake after mistake it presents. guyairey Summary: Honestly the worst chemistry textbook I've ever had. Rating: 1 First, this book is almost no help to me at all besides the referencing of equations. The explanations are not helpful and there are typos in each chapter. Mortimer has a knack for making even the simplest concepts difficult to understand with the way he writes. Some of the examples are helpful, but these are few. The book mainly does derivations of equations. I am taking an inorganic chemistry class at the same time as this physical chemistry class. Sometimes when I read my inorganic chemistry book, it explains some of the physical chemistry topics better than the physical chemistry book itself. I think that's pretty sad. Or I can go online, and it's often easier to find an online article explaining a concept well, rather than trying to understand the poorly worded explanations in this book. The only positive thing about this book that I can think of is that it seems to be very inclusive of a wide number of concepts and equations, and could make an okay reference book. However, there are often equations with typos in them. For example, one equation had some variables raised to the 1/2 power. Right beneath that, there was an example using the very same equation with the variables raised to the 3/2 power, not 1/2. Obviously a typo. Just one of many. Up till I had this book, I had always understood, or at least partially understood all the chemistry textbooks I've read. Like the title of this review says, this is honestly the worst chem textbook I've ever had. Summary: Needs lots of work Rating: 2 This book seems to have passed through the editing stage without actually being edited. There are at least 4-5 typos in each chapter. It takes longer to figure out what the questions are asking than it does to actually do the questions. Whoever solved the problems and put answers in the back did the majority of them incorrectly, because the answers are wrong. In the chapters themselves, the wording is unclear and confusing. I would highly recommmend checking out other P-Chem books before purchasing this one. 下载链接 http://www.filefactory.com/file/ ... gapedia.info__.html http://rapidshare.com/files/1069 ... gapedia.info__.html 解压密码 PHYCHETE.rar@tF |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
[武汉纺织大学]材料学院[姜伟团队名称]课题组-2026年硕士研究生调剂信息
已经有0人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有1人回复
-
有机高分子材料论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有102人回复
-
中国科学院·过程工程研究所·招聘海内外高层次人才---过程所“百人计划”
已经有5人回复
-
2026考博自荐
已经有4人回复
-
温敏水凝胶收缩
已经有0人回复
-
PDMS膜在溶液中的离子透过率
已经有0人回复
-
攒人品 论文祈福
已经有139人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修
已经有0人回复
-
science advances的AAAS系统上返修问题
已经有2人回复
-
LDPE黑十字为什么那么大
已经有0人回复
3楼2008-05-22 21:08:40
4楼2008-05-23 00:57:53
6楼2008-06-01 23:54:39
8楼2008-09-26 00:14:15
9楼2008-09-26 14:19:29
简单回复
2008-05-21 14:41
回复
2008-05-28 17:15
回复
支持
2008-09-25 21:52
回复
5