| 查看: 7497 | 回复: 18 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
zasxcdcd金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
请问一下投稿被Crosscheck查出来31%，编辑要求回应，该如何应对 已有12人参与
|
|||
|
之前投稿1个月给回大修，修改后返回编辑，又两个星期发来信小修，但是里面除了审稿人的意见之外还写了这样一段话： In addition, as you are aware, ACS is screening all manuscripts against the CrossCheck Database. As a result of this process we have received a similarity index greater than 30% for your manuscript. The iThenticate summary report obtained for your manuscript is attached. In particular, there are several statements in your manuscript that are verbatim text from: XXX., et al. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 20XX, XX, XX 之后查看了附件里面写了Similarity Index ：31% 看了一下，编辑提到的那篇有5%，都是在introduction的背景介绍里面 剩下的若干都是<1%的 有好多都是什么试剂名称或者仪器名称的啊，比如"1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC, Sigma, USA) and N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma, USA)"又或者是"Samples were measured by dynamic light scattering with a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern, UK)"， 还有一些方法学的部分，一些诸如HPLC的流速以及检测波长。。。很无语 另外还有一些就让我哭笑不得了，包括" Statistical analysis was performed using Student's T-test or one -way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test"这样的句子，以及在图表下方的“Data were expressed as Mean ± S.D. , *P<0.05 vs CON group, #P<0.05 vs XXX group”，这样的也会被认为重复抄袭部分。 请问各位虫友这种情况应该怎样修改呢，我是主要修改一下前面的5%的部分，还是说所有查出来的部分都要修改呢，然后回给编辑又要怎样说明呢，会不会直接就被毙掉了 。。。谢谢各位虫友了！ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 志存高远 自强不息 |
» 猜你喜欢
考研调剂
已经有12人回复
-
085500求调剂材料
已经有5人回复
-
化学工程调剂289
已经有40人回复
-
一志愿双非085400电子信息344 求调剂，对材料和化学方向也感兴趣
已经有8人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
080100力学316求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料专硕调剂
已经有17人回复
-
293调剂
已经有23人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有36人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有14人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请问一下各位大神们，什么叫“文献查新报告”？具体要求和格式是怎样的？
已经有3人回复
- 关于 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 杂志需要查重
已经有14人回复
- 投稿 Crosscheck 过高 怎么办
已经有30人回复
- 求助：投JNP，编辑说CrossCheck’s iThenticate software相似度大于30%，需修改
已经有9人回复
- crosscheck查重软件收入英文出版的书籍吗？
已经有3人回复
- 如何回复crosscheck results急求！！！感谢！！
已经有8人回复
- 投稿意见：相似度太高
已经有14人回复
- 2份iThenticate的CrossCheck报告 想避免被反剽窃软件误会的可以看看
已经有7人回复
- 投稿前需要在CrossCheck database上查重么？
已经有6人回复
- ---------CrossCheck被拒后--------这样可以重投回去吗？？？
已经有8人回复
zasxcdcd
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 109 (高中生)
- 金币: 1478.7
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 243
- 在线: 87.2小时
- 虫号: 1990560
- 注册: 2012-09-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药剂学
|
谢谢了，我老板说是他的失误，然后他写了信 但是我看到里面他直接承认了，这么写妥当么 We found that the major body of overlapped descriptions occurred in the Introduction Section. One important reference “XXX et al. XXX Title XXX. 20XX; X:17XX-XX.” has not been included in the reference list and a large number of sentences were directly copied from this paper. We sincerely apology for the serious and plain-fact mistake. We have revised this paragraph to avoid the reproduction. |
6楼2014-11-19 12:58:29
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2014-11-17 10:12:31
zasxcdcd
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 109 (高中生)
- 金币: 1478.7
- 红花: 16
- 帖子: 243
- 在线: 87.2小时
- 虫号: 1990560
- 注册: 2012-09-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药剂学
3楼2014-11-17 11:01:26
klmopq
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 16 (小学生)
- 金币: 3212.4
- 散金: 524
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 212
- 在线: 317.7小时
- 虫号: 725539
- 注册: 2009-03-18
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
book2005593: 金币+2, 鼓励交流~ 2014-11-17 13:52:39
小木虫: 金币+2, 帖子真精彩 2014-11-23 16:25:33
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
book2005593: 金币+2, 鼓励交流~ 2014-11-17 13:52:39
小木虫: 金币+2, 帖子真精彩 2014-11-23 16:25:33
|
我的回复 Dear Prof·····, We would like to express our sincere apologies to have so many overlapped descriptions in our manuscript, and we also really appreciate that you give us the opportunity to make explanation. We have provided the explanations in the following paragraph and revised the manuscript to avoid overlapped sentences with our previous papers. The revised parts have been highlighted in the submitted manuscript. Firstly, we would like to emphasize that this work is novel and different from our previous work and literature reports, which has been demonstrated by the positive comments from peer-reviewers. We also believed it has significant scientific impacts to be published in JPCC. For the overlapped descriptions, our reasons are as followed. 1. The major overlapped descriptions are in the experimental parts. ···························· 2. Another major overlapped parts are the affiliation and acknowledgment which is the same as our previous published paper······························. This is inevitable, because we are still working in the same university and supported by the same funding programs. 3. The others overlapped parts are minor, and mainly on the technical languages, such as ······························· 4. The fixed phrases of physical symbol annotations were overlapped, for example, ··································· 给满分我吧！！！ |
4楼2014-11-17 11:15:41
