| 查看: 2172 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
cherishenry新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
ESPR二审小修，还是跟一审一样的问题，请大神分析一下编辑的意见~~
|
||
|
Reviewers have now commented on your revised paper and they believe the manuscript has been considerably improved. However, before I can accept the manuscript I request the following: 1. The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study. What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ? Were replicate samples taken and analysed? Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates? What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC? Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ? The quality of the manuscript will be further improved by adding all of these method details, and will provide a clearer indication of the precision and accuracy of the measurements.（这个我大修的时候修了，我做的是重金属污染，涉及到原子吸收、ICP等仪器，还有重金属分级提取方法，大修的时候补充了仪器使用的金属标准液、还有仪器校准方法参照使用手册（这样写太简单了？），分级提取的回收率等等，结果现在还是这个问题啊！）请虫友们指点~~谢谢谢谢！ 2. Significant figures (in text and Tables): Please report data to 2 or 3 significant figures, maximum. The methods were no more precise than that, e.g. 6210.95 = 6210, 49.12% = 49%, ... 3. Uncertainty estimates (error bars) in Figures. Thank you for carefully providing error bars. Can you also provide a description of what these represent in the caption, e.g. Error bars represent standard deviation of n =3 measurements ... If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. （这句话说重新考虑是啥子意思？紧张！！） |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
281求调剂（0805）
已经有8人回复
-
环境领域全国重点实验室招收博士1-2名
已经有3人回复
-
材料专硕306英一数二
已经有10人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学化学工艺专业（081702）315分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
302求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
26博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
被我言中：新模板不强调格式了，假专家开始管格式了
已经有4人回复
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
你好，我最近ESPR也返回来了， 我做的是重金属，我想问一下第一个问题 The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study. What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ? Were replicate samples taken and analysed? Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates? What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC? Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ? 你是如何回复的呢？我这个问题看不太懂啊。。。 |
5楼2016-02-23 15:37:32
chenenslogan
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 201 (大学生)
- 金币: 1246.9
- 散金: 148
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 631
- 在线: 123.4小时
- 虫号: 2664352
- 注册: 2013-09-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物遗传学
2楼2014-10-07 14:01:18
tiangauyue
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 38 (小学生)
- 金币: 11269.5
- 散金: 216
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1508
- 在线: 164小时
- 虫号: 2884712
- 注册: 2013-12-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 遥感机理与方法
3楼2014-10-07 14:03:58
在比喻日年
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
寸理莱德
- 应助: 116 (高中生)
- 金币: 20954.9
- 散金: 146
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 3501
- 在线: 231.8小时
- 虫号: 2662169
- 注册: 2013-09-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子材料结构与性能
4楼2014-10-07 15:05:59
