24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2060  |  回复: 5

cherishenry

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] ESPR二审小修,还是跟一审一样的问题,请大神分析一下编辑的意见~~

Reviewers have now commented on your revised paper and they believe the manuscript has been considerably improved.

However, before I can accept the manuscript I request the following:

1.  The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study.
What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ?
Were replicate samples taken and analysed?  Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates?  What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC?   Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ?

The quality of the manuscript will be further improved by adding all of these method details, and will provide a clearer indication of the precision and accuracy of the measurements.(这个我大修的时候修了,我做的是重金属污染,涉及到原子吸收、ICP等仪器,还有重金属分级提取方法,大修的时候补充了仪器使用的金属标准液、还有仪器校准方法参照使用手册(这样写太简单了?),分级提取的回收率等等,结果现在还是这个问题啊!)请虫友们指点~~谢谢谢谢!

2. Significant figures (in text and Tables):  Please report data to 2 or 3 significant figures, maximum.  The methods were no more precise than that, e.g. 6210.95 = 6210, 49.12% = 49%, ...  

3. Uncertainty estimates (error bars) in Figures.  Thank you for carefully providing error bars.  Can you also provide a description of what these represent in the caption, e.g. Error bars represent standard deviation of n =3 measurements ...

If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. (这句话说重新考虑是啥子意思?紧张!!)
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenenslogan

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
不用紧张,大修的时候可能你在修改稿里没有明显标记出来,一般要红色标记出来你修改过的地方,其次可能是你没改到位,所以编辑让你再改。
最后一句话,套话,群发的。没有特别的意思。就是你修改后,编辑才能重新考虑其他的接受类的决定。
everythinghappensforthebest
2楼2014-10-07 14:01:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tiangauyue

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
问题不大啊,都说比第一次有了明显提高啊,你等待好消息啊

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
努力学习
3楼2014-10-07 14:03:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

在比喻日年

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

寸理莱德


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
无论怎样  照着他说的改就行  最重要的是让他看到你这次修改比上次有所提高  表明修改的地方。
黄屋非贵,天下为忧。
4楼2014-10-07 15:05:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zgkdyzz

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你好,我最近ESPR也返回来了, 我做的是重金属,我想问一下第一个问题 The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study.
What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ?
Were replicate samples taken and analysed?  Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates?  What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC?   Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ?
你是如何回复的呢?我这个问题看不太懂啊。。。
5楼2016-02-23 15:37:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cherishenry

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by zgkdyzz at 2016-02-23 15:37:32
你好,我最近ESPR也返回来了, 我做的是重金属,我想问一下第一个问题 The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study.
What standards were used and how were instruments  ...

看到的晚了 你查查他们期刊的同类论文 很多提到了标准物质参照 以及回收率之类的

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2016-03-08 17:36:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cherishenry 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见