| ²é¿´: 2166 | »Ø¸´: 5 | |||
cherishenryгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
ESPR¶þÉóСÐÞ£¬»¹ÊǸúÒ»ÉóÒ»ÑùµÄÎÊÌ⣬Çë´óÉñ·ÖÎöһϱ༵ÄÒâ¼û~~
|
|
Reviewers have now commented on your revised paper and they believe the manuscript has been considerably improved. However, before I can accept the manuscript I request the following: 1. The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study. What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ? Were replicate samples taken and analysed? Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates? What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC? Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ? The quality of the manuscript will be further improved by adding all of these method details, and will provide a clearer indication of the precision and accuracy of the measurements.£¨Õâ¸öÎÒ´óÐÞµÄʱºòÐÞÁË£¬ÎÒ×öµÄÊÇÖØ½ðÊôÎÛȾ£¬Éæ¼°µ½Ô×ÓÎüÊÕ¡¢ICPµÈÒÇÆ÷£¬»¹ÓÐÖØ½ðÊô·Ö¼¶ÌáÈ¡·½·¨£¬´óÐÞµÄʱºò²¹³äÁËÒÇÆ÷ʹÓõĽðÊô±ê×¼Òº¡¢»¹ÓÐÒÇÆ÷У׼·½·¨²ÎÕÕʹÓÃÊֲᣨÕâÑùд̫¼òµ¥ÁË£¿£©£¬·Ö¼¶ÌáÈ¡µÄ»ØÊÕÂʵȵȣ¬½á¹ûÏÖÔÚ»¹ÊÇÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ°¡£¡£©Çë³æÓÑÃÇÖ¸µã~~лллл£¡ 2. Significant figures (in text and Tables): Please report data to 2 or 3 significant figures, maximum. The methods were no more precise than that, e.g. 6210.95 = 6210, 49.12% = 49%, ... 3. Uncertainty estimates (error bars) in Figures. Thank you for carefully providing error bars. Can you also provide a description of what these represent in the caption, e.g. Error bars represent standard deviation of n =3 measurements ... If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. £¨Õâ¾ä»°ËµÖØÐ¿¼ÂÇÊÇɶ×ÓÒâ˼£¿½ôÕÅ£¡£¡£© |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
NSFCÉ걨ÊéÀïÉêÇëÈ˼òÀúÖдú±íÐÔÂÛÖø»¹ÐèÒªÔÚÉ걨Êé×îºóµÄ¸½¼þÀïÃæÔÙÉÏ´«Ò»±éÂð
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ327Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á0703
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Áº³ÉΰÀÏʦ¿ÎÌâ×é»¶ÓÄãµÄ¼ÓÈë
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»ï°éÃÇ£¬×£ÎÒÉúÈÕ¿ìÀÖ°É
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
ÖпÆÔº²ÄÁÏ273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶274Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
chenenslogan
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 201 (´óѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1246.9
- É¢½ð: 148
- ºì»¨: 14
- Ìû×Ó: 631
- ÔÚÏß: 123.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2664352
- ×¢²á: 2013-09-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ö²ÎïÒÅ´«Ñ§

2Â¥2014-10-07 14:01:18
tiangauyue
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 38 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 11269.5
- É¢½ð: 216
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 1508
- ÔÚÏß: 164Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2884712
- ×¢²á: 2013-12-20
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò£¸Ð»úÀíÓë·½·¨

3Â¥2014-10-07 14:03:58
ÔÚ±ÈÓ÷ÈÕÄê
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
´çÀíÀ³µÂ
- Ó¦Öú: 116 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 20940.9
- É¢½ð: 146
- ºì»¨: 8
- Ìû×Ó: 3499
- ÔÚÏß: 231.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2662169
- ×¢²á: 2013-09-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϽṹÓëÐÔÄÜ

4Â¥2014-10-07 15:05:59
zgkdyzz
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3.5
- Ìû×Ó: 3
- ÔÚÏß: 2.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2785832
- ×¢²á: 2013-11-07
- רҵ: ÄÜÔ´»¯¹¤
¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
ÄãºÃ£¬ÎÒ×î½üESPRÒ²·µ»ØÀ´ÁË£¬ ÎÒ×öµÄÊÇÖØ½ðÊô£¬ÎÒÏëÎÊһϵÚÒ»¸öÎÊÌâ The Quality Assurance(QA) / Quality Control (QC) appears lacking from your study. What standards were used and how were instruments / techniques calibrated ? Were replicate samples taken and analysed? Were duplicate analyses made, and if so, how close were the duplicates? What analysis Blanks, replicates and certified reference (CRMs) were analysed as part of the QA/QC? Were the results for the CRMs within the expected ranges? What were the limits of reporting for the various methods ? ÄãÊÇÈçºÎ»Ø¸´µÄÄØ£¿ÎÒÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ¿´²»Ì«¶®°¡¡£¡£¡£ |
5Â¥2016-02-23 15:37:32
cherishenry
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 60.3
- É¢½ð: 5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 46
- ÔÚÏß: 16.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2309946
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-01
- רҵ: ÎÛȾ¿ØÖÆ»¯Ñ§
|
¿´µ½µÄÍíÁË Äã²é²éËûÃÇÆÚ¿¯µÄͬÀàÂÛÎÄ ºÜ¶àÌáµ½Á˱ê×¼ÎïÖʲÎÕÕ ÒÔ¼°»ØÊÕÂÊÖ®ÀàµÄ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
6Â¥2016-03-08 17:36:00













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20