| 查看: 3167 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
大神们Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics还是SCI啊？ 已有1人参与
|
||
周围同学唰唰的都在发论文，真是牛到不行。请教一下各位Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics是SCI不，怎么看是几区的额？菜鸟一枚，请赐教 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有24人回复
-
估计是周四
已经有3人回复
-
基金啊基金
已经有3人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有15人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有10人回复
-
言之凿凿，明天官网会通知放榜？
已经有17人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有17人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有23人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 关于Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics投稿论文格式问题
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见回复中如何理解 make a close review？
已经有8人回复
- JIT 这个杂志怎么样？还是SCI检索吗？ 审稿周期长不长啊
已经有15人回复
- 第一篇英文文章什么时候投出去？
已经有8人回复
- 如何索要invoice
已经有3人回复
- Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics怎么上传文章
已经有5人回复
- 有谁了解 algal research 这个期刊？
已经有4人回复
- Quotations and sayings about Success
已经有5人回复
- 有人投过PEP，也就是“propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics”文章过吗？
已经有26人回复
- Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics的版面费问题
已经有4人回复
- 救命！最后一关，proof的几个问题，急
已经有13人回复
- 有人投过Multiscale Modeling and Simulation (MMS)
已经有9人回复
- 【求助】寻：2010年机械类的国际会议
已经有17人回复
3楼2014-09-28 10:17:52
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2014-09-27 16:21:10
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
4楼2014-09-28 10:21:24
|
谢谢额 能不能麻烦您帮我看看编辑部回复的信息是什么意思吗？没什么经验，不知道想这种回复下一步该做这么？非常感谢！！ 24-Sep-2014 Dear xxx, Your manuscript xxxx of which you submitted the REVISED version to Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, has been reviewed. The comments of the referee(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. A revised version of your manuscript that takes into account the comments of the referee(s) will be reconsidered for publication. You can upload your revised manuscript and submit it through your Author Center. Note: when submitting your revised manuscript, you will be required to respond to the comments made by the referee(s) in the space provided. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, Mrs. Stefanie Mutterer Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics pep@ict.fraunhofer.de *** Referee(s) Comments to Author *** Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This paper requires ... extreme ... editing into English language that would be understandable by people who are interested in the subject of target penetration by shaped charges (especially those people for whom English is not their primary language). In the paper's current form, too many non-conventional words are used with such poor grammar that the paper is only understandable with great effort by someone who is well-versed in the topic. However, the paper does present a well-constructed example of experimentation, modeling and computation that should prove useful to other researchers. Comments of the Editorial Office: Please find attached a revised Word-file from the reviewer. I´m not really happy with it because there were still some inconsistences e.g. the reviewer didn´t give the reference [7] of Luttwak, but maybe you can use it as a proposal to improve your manuskript. |
5楼2014-09-28 11:07:50
40