| 查看: 773 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
求助汉译英
|
||
|
由表1、2的RD和ARD值的大小可以看出,采用Apelblat方程的结果最好,经验多项式方程、λh方程关联的结果次之,即Apelblat方程在本文所研究的体系及温度范围更为适合。相对而言,Apelblat方程关联的相关系数R2均在0.99以上,平均相对误差(ARD)小于4%,最大的均根方偏差(105RSMD)为27.56;经验多项式方程的相关系数R2均在0.99以上,平均相对误差(ARD)小于4%,最大的均根方偏差(105RSMD)为48.16;λh方程关联的相关系数R2均在0.91以上,平均相对误差(ARD)小于18%,最大的均根方偏差(105RSMD)为84.73。图1-12更明显的展示各个方程的关联结果。 用Apelblat方程拟合后计算的数据与实验数据对比如下: |
» 猜你喜欢
微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读
已经有17人回复
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有5人回复
系统今天又提示维护了,估计离放榜不远了
已经有14人回复
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有6人回复
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有17人回复
今年的WR进展到哪一步了?
已经有9人回复
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么?
已经有7人回复
2楼2014-09-16 14:27:40
ssssllllnnnn
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 翻译EPI: 1690
- 应助: 452 (硕士)
- 金币: 31580.9
- 红花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在线: 19966.6小时
- 虫号: 3328089
- 注册: 2014-07-17
- 专业: 肿瘤发生
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
真强必胜: 金币+3, 谢谢 2014-09-17 08:40:44
MASc-girl: 金币+50, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-09-17 08:47:48
真强必胜: 金币+3, 谢谢 2014-09-17 08:40:44
MASc-girl: 金币+50, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-09-17 08:47:48
|
As can be seen by the values of RD and ARD in tables 1 and 2, the best results were obtained with Apelblat equation, followed by empirical polynomial equation and λh equation. Therefore, Apelblat equation was more suitable for the study system and the temperature range used in this paper. Relatively speaking, all the correlation coefficients R2 obtained with Apelblat equations were above 0.99, with the average relative error (ARD) less than 4% and the maximum root mean square deviation (105RSMD) of 27.56. Similarly, all the correlation coefficients R2 obtained with experience polynomial equation were also above 0.99, with the average relative error (ARD) less than 4% and the maximum root mean square deviation (105RSMD) was 48.16. However, all the correlation coefficients R2 obtained with λh equations were above 0.91, with the average relative error (ARD) less than 18% and the maximum root mean square deviation (105RSMD) was 84.73. Figure 1-12 showed a more straightforward results of the individual equations. The Data calculated with Apelblat equation fitting and the experimental data were compared as follows: |
3楼2014-09-16 23:42:39











回复此楼