| 查看: 2795 | 回复: 56 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
RSC Advance 大修，看有机会么？
|
|||
|
小弟手上的论文从JPCC，到ACS，再到PCCP最终转投到RSC Advance,前几个都是已不符合刊物主旨秒拒，RSC经转投整整两个月给了修改意见，大修，但是两个审稿人给的意见都很笼统，觉得很棘手，请各位大侠开下，希望大不！ Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author Overall, XXXX is a very common topic: (1) Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 are not necessary, there are general concepts, (2) Actually, the insertion method herein shows no obvious advantages over the reported, and the authors ignored the important references, (3) Secondly, the manuscript also shows no novelty in the aspects of chemical sciences, (4) The English of the manuscript should be refined. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author 1. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. (Such as Page 1 Lines 6, 13, 17, 20, and so on) 2. Please provide some details in the "Experimental section", such as: what is the structural formulas and the chemical composition of XXXXX? 3. Several important contributions, such as the work of Wenchang Yan (2012, 2013), should be mentioned. 4. Please provide more evidences for the existence of isatin in the interlayer space or the channels of XXXXXXX. I believe dissolution test should be performed for further estimation. Moreover, clear morphological and porous characters for XXXXXXX and its composition should be provided, such as the SEM results. 5. Conclusions should be re-organized for the clear and concise purpose. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有13人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有11人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- RSC Advance 是几区的？
已经有21人回复
- RSC ADV的编辑靠谱还是不靠谱？
已经有46人回复
- 谈谈RSC Adv的投稿与审稿
已经有9人回复
- RSC advance多长时间外审
已经有11人回复
- RSC Advance审稿意见求分析
已经有3人回复
- RSC ADV投稿的问题
已经有8人回复
- RSC Advance杂志如何？
已经有35人回复
- RSC advance 杂志 TOC 格式要求
已经有3人回复
- applied catalysis B 被拒 可以改投哪里？
已经有5人回复
- 关于RSC ADVANCE投稿的问题
已经有12人回复
- RSC Advances大修后多久能有消息
已经有9人回复
- 纳米材料可控制备及特性研究投稿方向询问
已经有6人回复
- AIP advance审稿人拒稿编辑让修改
已经有11人回复
- RSC Advances据稿快吗？
已经有11人回复
- rsc advaces给审稿人多长时间
已经有15人回复
- RSC Advances综述--minor revision
已经有32人回复
- RSC Advances预计影响因子能有多少？
已经有26人回复
- RSC ADV两次大修以后，终于顺利接收了，速度很快
已经有4人回复
- 投CC，后被主编转到RSC ADV，一周就返回了审稿意见，现在大修返回，under review中
已经有13人回复
- RSC ADVANCE要收费吗？
已经有4人回复
- CC悲剧，要投RSC Advance吗？
已经有13人回复
34楼2014-08-28 15:06:22
3楼2014-08-28 14:28:47
简单回复
yuguiyan4楼
2014-08-28 14:34
回复
vinick(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， [ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
zhuyaneres13楼
2014-08-28 14:50
回复
vinick(金币+1): 谢谢参与
支持
200