24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

vinick

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1408.8
帖子: 318
在线: 148.7小时
虫号: 2161106

[交流] RSC Advance 大修，看有机会么？

小弟手上的论文从JPCC，到ACS，再到PCCP最终转投到RSC Advance,前几个都是已不符合刊物主旨秒拒，RSC经转投整整两个月给了修改意见，大修，但是两个审稿人给的意见都很笼统，觉得很棘手，请各位大侠开下，希望大不！

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Referee: 1

Comments to the Author
Overall, XXXX is a very common topic:
(1) Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 are not necessary, there are general concepts,
(2) Actually, the insertion method herein shows no obvious advantages over the reported, and the authors ignored the important references,
(3) Secondly, the manuscript also shows no novelty in the aspects of chemical sciences,
(4) The English of the manuscript should be refined.

Referee: 2

Comments to the Author
1. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. (Such as Page 1 Lines 6, 13, 17, 20, and so on)
2. Please provide some details in the "Experimental section", such as: what is the structural formulas and the chemical composition of XXXXX?
3. Several important contributions, such as the work of Wenchang Yan (2012, 2013), should be mentioned.
4. Please provide more evidences for the existence of isatin in the interlayer space or the channels of XXXXXXX. I believe dissolution test should be performed for further estimation. Moreover, clear morphological and porous characters for XXXXXXX and its composition should be provided, such as the SEM results.
5. Conclusions should be re-organized for the clear and concise purpose.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

RSC Advance 是几区的？已经有21人回复
RSC ADV的编辑靠谱还是不靠谱？已经有46人回复
谈谈RSC Adv的投稿与审稿已经有9人回复
RSC advance多长时间外审已经有11人回复
RSC Advance审稿意见求分析已经有3人回复
RSC ADV投稿的问题已经有8人回复
RSC Advance杂志如何？已经有35人回复
RSC advance 杂志 TOC 格式要求已经有3人回复
applied catalysis B 被拒可以改投哪里？已经有5人回复
关于RSC ADVANCE投稿的问题已经有12人回复
RSC Advances大修后多久能有消息已经有9人回复
纳米材料可控制备及特性研究投稿方向询问已经有6人回复
AIP advance审稿人拒稿编辑让修改已经有11人回复
RSC Advances据稿快吗？已经有11人回复
rsc advaces给审稿人多长时间已经有15人回复
RSC Advances综述--minor revision 已经有32人回复
RSC Advances预计影响因子能有多少？已经有26人回复
RSC ADV两次大修以后，终于顺利接收了，速度很快已经有4人回复
投CC，后被主编转到RSC ADV，一周就返回了审稿意见，现在大修返回，under review中已经有13人回复
RSC ADVANCE要收费吗？已经有4人回复
CC悲剧，要投RSC Advance吗？已经有13人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-08-28 14:24:25

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

vinick

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1408.8
帖子: 318
在线: 148.7小时
虫号: 2161106

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by bushiniuren at 2014-08-28 14:28:47
感觉还是新颖性遭到质疑吧。楼主应该仔细看看审稿人提出的那几篇文献，找找和自己文章的不同之处，以及优于其他文献的一些特点。另外，找一个专业英语好点的帮忙看看语法错误，个人觉得不必要
用多长的句子，只要把 ...

说实话审稿人2说的文献和我的内容主题不一样，审稿人1看问题的角度和我们的也不同，可能不是我们本专业的审稿人，不能反驳又不能统一，纠结啊！