| 查看: 581 | 回复: 0 | |||
joyce79928铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
siesta & transiesta model question
|
|
I want to relax the structure for transiesta calculation I have seen some transiesta example and discover that electrode are not continuous in PBC. they are independent between another electrode in next PBC. but is it OK for a continuous electrode?(like the picture attached, the top four atoms is scatter region) furthermore, the model include five layers of 111 Al surface as electrode(12 atoms each layer, like the file attached) after relaxation, I will do the electrode calculation using transiesta the electrode calculation I include 3 layer of 111 Al material (3 layers for a 111 direction unit cell, totally 36 atoms) then when I do the scatter region calculation, should I need to set TS.NumUsedAtomsLeft = TS.NumUsedAtomsLeft= 27? is this setting correct? and TS.BuerAtomsLeft=14=TS.BuerAtomsRight? ( five layers of 111 Al=60 atoms minus 36 atoms equals 14) one more question I have seen the example of siesta http://dipc.ehu.es/frederiksen/tstutorial/index.php/AuH2-example the electrode they use only have 4 atoms (for each side) but the Au atoms they used in scatter region calculation have 11 atoms for each side. they set TS.NumUsedAtomsLeft =4 because they only calculate 4 atoms in electrode calculation. how about the rest 7 Au atoms in electrode? should they set the rest 7 Au atoms in TS.BufferAtomsLeft? But they didn't set this flag. what happens here? Thank you! 2014-08-07_151602.png |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有13人回复
找到一些相关的精华帖子,希望有用哦~
【求助】siesta中transiesta模块的收敛标准是啥~~
已经有20人回复
【求助】siesta中transiesta模块的收敛问题
已经有13人回复
科研从小木虫开始,人人为我,我为人人










回复此楼
点击这里搜索更多相关资源
30