| 查看: 551 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
只给了一个审稿人的意见，修改后不明白编辑的意思
|
|
编辑只给了一个审稿人的意见，我恢复了以后，编辑的意见如下：不知怎么个意思？ Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The revisions made improve the manuscript significantly. However, I would like the figure showing the effect of Guinadine nitrate concentration on RR included in the manuscript. Once that is done, it can be accepted for publication. ALSO: For some reason there was no response to reviewer 2's comments: Recommendation (please tick one) Accept without modification: Request modifications: X (Complete Sections B and C of report form) Reject: (Complete Section D of report form) A. General Commentary Judgement of Paper: 6.5 (Use scale of 1-10. 1 = Poor, 5 = Marginal, 8 = Good, 10 - Exceptional ) In reading the manuscript, I caught a few mistakes. In the Abstract section the word "rate" is misspelled "rat." Page 8 - During CMP, cuprous oxides can be as inhibitors to maintain a low etch rate of copper in the trench…. It would appear at least a word is missing, perhaps this could be better stated as - cuprous oxide may act as an inhibitor…." Page 11 - "As we can be seen from Figure 9(b)….." The grammar seems awkward. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0703求调剂383分
已经有9人回复
-
求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
化学调剂求助
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿哈尔滨工业大学085600英一数二337分求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
085600，320分求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
一志愿211，化学学硕，310分，本科重点双非，求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
0703化学调剂325分
已经有10人回复
-
085600，321分求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
化学357分，考研调剂
已经有12人回复
-
一志愿南昌大学，085600，344分求调剂
已经有8人回复
