24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 294  |  回复: 2
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wxqtjw

铁虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 汉译英,帮忙修改一下,谢谢。

样品1的模量要高于样品2,而内耗却低于样品2,这可能两个样品的不同的微观结构有关。与样品2相比,样品1的缺陷更多,经计算得出有缺陷引起的最大模量值为2E11。

The modulus of sample 1 was higher than that of sample 2, while sample 1 revealed a lower internal friction than sample 2, which may be related to the different microstructures of the two samples.  There were more defects in the sample 1 comparing with  sample 2, and it was calculated that the maximum modulus caused by defects is 2E11.
哈哈哈哈,我来了
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

phu_grassman

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

快乐岛、布吉岛岛主

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
RXMCDM: 金币+1, 多谢应助! 2014-07-26 00:12:22
wxqtjw: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-07-28 12:24:30
Sample 1 has higher modulus, yet lower internal friction than Sample 2. This can be due to the different microstructures of the two samples. Compared with Sample 2, there are more defects in Sample 1. The maximum modulus resulted from the defects is calculated to be 2E11.
3楼2014-07-25 22:04:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 3 个回答

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

Translator and Proofreader


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
RXMCDM: 金币+1, 多谢应助! 2014-07-26 00:12:35
wxqtjw: 金币+5, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-07-28 12:24:26
Even though the modulus of sample 1 was higher than that of sample 2, sample 1 exhibited a lower internal friction than sample 2. The possible explanation was due to the different microstructures of the two samples.  There were more defects in sample 1 than those in sample 2 and the calculated maximum modulus caused by defects was 2E11.
2楼2014-07-25 13:12:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见