| 查看: 1302 | 回复: 2 | ||
[求助]
一审6个月二审3个月 AE这是啥意思 等不起了
|
|
投了EJSS,一审大修,二审又大修,一个审稿人接受,一个人拒稿,AE给个大修,不知道修后还会不会给那个审稿人看啊,万一他还不满意,是不是就悲剧了,大家帮我分析一下,等着毕业呢,心里着急啊! Associate Editor's Comments to Author: I have two referee's reports of this resubmitted paper: one recommends to accept, while the other to reject&resubmit. I recommend a major revision. The topic that the authors attempt to address is important in that we need to find methods to deal with XXXXXXXX. The methods is not entirely new in that the approach was first suggested by XXX et al and later used in soil science by XXX et al. The authors propose some improvements in the methodology compared to the XXX et al work and I think that this is valid and the paper warrants publication. However, the authors need to thoroughly address the referee's comments and make it absolutely clear what are the improvements that they bring to the methodology compared to XXX et al. Proof is essential here and not mere assertions. Note that referee 2 feels that his first lot of comments were not adequately addressed. The authors need to do so. I would also urge the authors to include improve the English of the manuscript. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有7人回复
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
找导师
已经有8人回复
国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上)
已经有13人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
学科评审组评审是指会评吗?
已经有5人回复
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
2楼2016-03-05 17:58:44
gnehsijux
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5075.1
- 散金: 169
- 帖子: 171
- 在线: 715.1小时
- 虫号: 1964098
- 注册: 2012-08-30
- 专业: 土壤学
3楼2016-07-06 20:36:01










回复此楼
