24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3818)
>虫友互识 (549)
>文献求助 (476)
>导师招生 (349)
>考博 (193)
>休闲灌水 (184)
>论文投稿 (174)
>硕博家园 (126)
>基金申请 (115)
>招聘信息布告栏 (89)
>博后之家 (81)
>教师之家 (65)
>论文道贺祈福 (60)
>找工作 (41)
>公派出国 (41)
>考研 (39)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

晓雾迷晨

铁虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 146.5
帖子: 1
在线: 1.7小时
虫号: 1762612
注册: 2012-04-18
专业: 其他无机非金属材料

[交流] 论文被electrochemica Acta 拒搞，编辑建议修改重投，有戏吗？

On the whole, the recommendations could leave some chance for the paper to be prepared in a more acceptable form for publication, but it is however clear that the manuscript has to be substantially revised and improved, practically rewritten. In particular, the comments of Referee 1 are especially severe. Under similar circumstances, from an editorial point of view the manuscript can only be PROVISIONALLY REJECTED. This means that, if you wish, you may resubmit a new manuscript based on this work. It is up to you to judge whether you will be able to present convincing arguments to the referees, particularly to Referee 1. In resubmitting a new version, please be aware that the new manuscript has to go to the relevant reviewers for further perusal and should thus either conform to or adequately rebut their requests. In any case the new manuscript will receive a different registration number.
In particular, I urge you to conform to the TECHNICAL EDITORIAL ISSUES as well as to the guidelines regarding HIGHLIGHTS.

Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript does not address the main points of the review comments. To make my comments clear (….the influence of length and morphology on the photoactivity……)In the manuscript, the increase of photoconversion efficiency for the tubes from different electrolytes is associated to different reasons. In the present state the results are not really convincing to support the conclusions. Therefore I cannot recommend the manuscript to be published.
审稿人1第一次说我的文章没有新意，修改后回复如上，说文章分析不全面，和目前很多文章不太吻合之类，坚持cannot recommend the manuscript to be published。

Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed the reviewers' concerns, especially those pertaining to the quality of the sample preparation. The revised manuscript has been improved and therefore, I recommend publication in Electrochimica Acta after a refinement of the English on the revised/new text.
审稿人2觉得修改的可以，推荐录用了~再改改语言
然后编辑给了rejected，这种情况修改重投希望大吗？或者直接换个影响因子低一点的投？

回复此楼